RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 ENO1 as a biomarker of breast cancer progression and metastasis – a bioinformatic approach
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.11.01.23297919
DO 10.1101/2023.11.01.23297919
A1 Giannoudis, Athina
A1 Heath, Alistair
A1 Sharma, Vijay
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/01/2023.11.01.23297919.abstract
AB Background Metabolic reprogramming is one of the hallmarks of cancer cells and many key metabolic enzymes are dysregulated. In breast cancer (BC), the commonest malignancy of women, several metabolic enzymes are overexpressed and/or overactivated. One of these is Enolase 1 (ENO1) an enzyme that catalyses glycolysis but is also involved in the regulation of multiple signalling pathways. ENO1 overexpression in BC has been linked to worse tumour prognosis and metastasis, rendering it a promising biomarker of disease progression and a potential therapeutic target.Methods Utilising available online platforms such as the KM-plotter, the ROC-plotter, the cBioPortal, the G-2-O, the MethSurvand, we performed a bioinformatic analysis to establish the prognostic and predictive effects related to ENO1 expression in breast cancer. A Network analysis was also performed using the Oncomine platform and signalling and epigenetic pathways including immune regulation constituting the hallmarks of cancer were explored. The relationship between ENO1 and the immune response was also obtained from the TISIDB portal and Spearman’s rho (r) was used to determine their correlation.Results ENO1 is overexpressed in all the analysed Oncomine, epigenetic and immune pathways in triple-negative, but not in hormone receptor-positive BCs. In HER2-positive BCs, ENO1 expression showed a mixed profile. Similarly, analysis on disease progression and histological types showed ENO1 overexpression in ductal in situ and invasive carcinoma, high grade tumours followed by advanced and/or metastasis and was linked to worse survival (death by 5 years). High ENO1 expression was also associated with relapse-free (RFS), distant metastasis-free (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) as analysed by the KM-plot software, irrespectively of treatment and was also related to basal subtype and to a lesser extend to HER2 and luminal B subtypes. ENO1 was underexpressed in the less invasive and with better prognosis subtypes.Conclusions Overexpression of ENO1 largely confers a worse prognosis in breast cancer and recruits a range of signalling pathways during disease progression. ENO1 expression can be utilised as a biomarker of disease progression and as a potential therapeutic target, particularly in triple-negative and invasive breast carcinomas (NST).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files. The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article have been generated using the following websites: www.kmplotter.com, http://www.g-2-o.com http://www.cbioportal.org https://www.oncomine.org https://biit.cs.ut.ee/methsurv/ www.rocplotter.com https://epifactors.autosome.ru http://cis.hku.hk/TISIDB/ and appropriate references to these are included in the manuscript.