RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Urinary Metal Levels and Coronary Artery Calcification: Longitudinal Evidence in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.10.31.23297878
DO 10.1101/2023.10.31.23297878
A1 McGraw, Katlyn E.
A1 Schilling, Kathrin
A1 Glabonjat, Ronald A.
A1 Galvez-Fernandez, Marta
A1 Domingo-Relloso, Arce
A1 Martinez-Morata, Irene
A1 Jones, Miranda R.
A1 Post, Wendy S.
A1 Kaufman, Joel
A1 Tellez-Plaza, Maria
A1 Valeri, Linda
A1 Brown, Elizabeth R.
A1 Kronmal, Richard A.
A1 Barr, Graham R.
A1 Shea, Steven
A1 Navas-Acien, Ana
A1 Sanchez, Tiffany R.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/01/2023.10.31.23297878.abstract
AB Objective Growing evidence indicates that exposure to metals are risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We hypothesized that higher urinary levels of metals with prior evidence of an association with CVD, including non-essential (cadmium, tungsten, and uranium) and essential (cobalt, copper, and zinc) metals are associated with baseline and rate of change of coronary artery calcium (CAC) progression, a subclinical marker of atherosclerotic CVD.Methods We analyzed data from 6,418 participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) with spot urinary metal levels at baseline (2000-2002) and 1-4 repeated measures of spatially weighted coronary calcium score (SWCS) over a ten-year period. SWCS is a unitless measure of CAC highly correlated to the Agatston score but with numerical values assigned to individuals with Agatston score=0. We used linear mixed effect models to assess the association of baseline urinary metal levels with baseline SWCS, annual change in SWCS, and SWCS over ten years of follow-up. Urinary metals (adjusted to µg/g creatinine) and SWCS were log transformed. Models were progressively adjusted for baseline sociodemographic factors, estimated glomerular filtration rate, lifestyle factors, and clinical factors.Results At baseline, the median and interquartile range (25th, 75th) of SWCS was 6.3 (0.7, 58.2). For urinary cadmium, the fully adjusted geometric mean ratio (GMR) (95%Cl) of SWCS comparing the highest to the lowest quartile was 1.51 (1.32, 1.74) at baseline and 1.75 (1.47, 2.07) at ten years of follow-up. For urinary tungsten, uranium, and cobalt the corresponding GMRs at ten years of follow-up were 1.45 (1.23, 1.71), 1.39 (1.17, 1.64), and 1.47 (1.25, 1.74), respectively. For copper and zinc, the association was attenuated with adjustment for clinical risk factors; GMRs at ten years of follow-up before and after adjustment for clinical risk factors were 1.55 (1.30, 1.84) and 1.33 (1.12, 1.58), respectively, for copper and 1.85 (1.56, 2.19) and 1.57 (1.33, 1.85) for zinc.Conclusion Higher levels of cadmium, tungsten, uranium, cobalt, copper, and zinc, as measured in urine, were associated with subclinical CVD at baseline and at follow-up. These findings support the hypothesis that metals are pro-atherogenic factors.CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE What is new?Urinary levels of non-essential (cadmium, tungsten, uranium) and essential metals (cobalt, copper, zinc) are associated with coronary artery calcification at baseline and at ten years of follow up in a diverse US sample.What are the clinical implications?Reductions in environmental metal exposure may improve cardiovascular health.Dietary and chelation interventions to reduce metals in the body may improve CVD outcomes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) is supported by contracts 75N92020D00001, HHSN268201500003I, N01-HC-95159, 75N92020D00005, N01-HC-95160, 75N92020D00002, N01-HC-95161, 75N92020D00003, N01-HC-95162, 75N92020D00006, N01-HC-95163, 75N92020D00004, N01-HC-95164, 75N92020D00007, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168 and N01-HC-95169 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and by grants UL1-TR-000040, UL1-TR-001079, and UL1-TR-001420 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). This publication was developed under the Science to Achieve Results (STAR) research assistance agreements, No. RD831697 (MESA Air) and RD-83830001 (MESA Air Next Stage), awarded by the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It has not been formally reviewed by the EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the authors and the EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication. Dr. Maria Tellez-Plaza was supported by grants PI15/00071 and PI22/00029 from the Strategic Action for Health Research, Instituto de Salud Carlos III and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, and co-funded with European Funds for Regional Development (FEDER). The opinions and views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spain). Work in the authors? laboratories is also supported in part by NIH grants P42ES023716, P42ES010349, P42ES033719, P30ES009089, T32ES007322, R01ES029967, R01HL155576. The authors thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org. This paper has been reviewed and approved by the MESA Publications and Presentations Committee.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All participants gave written informed consent. The Institutional Review Board at each MESA study site approved the study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableSince the data is protected health information, all data is managed and released by the MESA team.