RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Is Gauchian genotyping of <em>GBA1</em> variants reliable?
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.10.26.23297627
DO 10.1101/2023.10.26.23297627
A1 Tayebi, Nahid
A1 Lichtenberg, Jens
A1 Hertz, Ellen
A1 Sidransky, Ellen
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/26/2023.10.26.23297627.abstract
AB Biallelic mutations in GBA1 result in Gaucher disease (GD), the inherited deficiency of glucocerebrosidase. Variants in GBA1 are also a common genetic risk factor for Parkinson disease (PD). Currently, some PD centers screen for mutant GBA1 alleles to stratify patients who may ultimately benefit from GBA1-targeted therapeutics. However, accurately detecting variants, especially recombinant alleles resulting from a crossover between GBA1 and its pseudogene, is challenging, impacting studies of both GD and GBA1-associated parkinsonism. Recently, the software tool Gauchian was introduced to identify GBA1 variants from whole genome sequencing. We evaluated Gauchian in 90 Sanger-sequenced patients with GD and five GBA1 heterozygotes. While Gauchian genotyped most patients correctly, it missed some rare or de novo mutations due to its limited internal database and over-reliance on intergenic structural variants. This resulted in misreported homozygosity, incomplete genotypes, and undetected recombination events, limiting Gauchian’s utility in variant screening and precluding its use in diagnostics.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the intramural research programs of the National Human Genome Research Institute and the National Institutes of Health. This research was also funded in part by Aligning Science Across Parkinson's [ASAP-000458] through the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (MJFF). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC-BY public copyright license to all Author Accepted Manuscripts arising from this submission.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Samples were collected under an NIH IRB clinical protocol 86HG0096I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes