RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Artificial intelligence and health equity in primary care: A qualitative study with key stakeholders
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.10.25.23297533
DO 10.1101/2023.10.25.23297533
A1 d’Elia, Alexander
A1 Gabbay, Mark
A1 Frith, Lucy
A1 Rodgers, Sarah
A1 Kierans, Ciara
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/26/2023.10.25.23297533.abstract
AB Artificial Intelligence (AI)-augmented interventions are currently being rolled out across primary care, but how it affects health equity remains insufficiently understood. This qualitative study addresses this gap through an ethnographical inquiry based on 32 interviews and focus groups with stakeholders including commissioners, decision makers, AI developers, researchers, GPs and patient groups involved in the implementation of AI in English primary care. We took a sociotechnical perspective in order to assess how the stakeholders can improve health equity through the implementation process of AI within the wider system. We found that regulation and policy alone cannot guarantee equitable implementation of AI but can provide a framework to enable other stakeholders to take measures to promote equity: fostering a shared understanding of the causal mechanisms of AI and health equity, how to measure health equity, and how to share data necessary for equity promotion. Further, all stakeholders need to be on board for equitable implementation, and currently innovation leaves clinicians and patients behind. Capacity building is needed to achieve this, in particular at local commissioning and clinician level. Careful implementation and pragmatically focused research are needed to make AI in primary care capable of advancing health equity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was conducted as part of the PhD project Artificial Intelligence and Health Inequities in Primary Care, by Alexander d'Elia. The PhD project is funded by Applied Research Collaboration Northwest Coast (ARC NWC), in turn funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The research ethics committee at The University of Liverpool gave ethical approval for this work, reference number 10229.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors, with the exception of identifiable interview and participant data.