PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Handzic, Armin AU - Xie, Jim Shenchu AU - Hendriks, Eef AU - Mosimann, Pascal AU - Nicholson, Patrick AU - Micieli, Jonathan AU - Margolin, Edward TI - Visual and pharmacotherapy outcomes after transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension AID - 10.1101/2023.10.23.23297230 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.10.23.23297230 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/25/2023.10.23.23297230.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/25/2023.10.23.23297230.full AB - Background Transverse sinus stenting (TSS) is an increasingly commonly used treatment for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). However, detailed neuro-ophthalmic evidence on visual and pharmacotherapy outcomes after TSS is scarce and heterogeneous. This study aimed to describe the visual outcomes of patients undergoing TSS for IIH and to ascertain the proportion of patients who could be weaned off intracranial pressure (ICP)-lowering medication after this procedure.Methods A retrospective chart review of all patients with IIH from two tertiary academic neuro-ophthalmology practices who underwent TSS between 2016 and 2022 was performed. Indications for stenting included failure of pharmacotherapy, intolerance of pharmacotherapy, and acute vision loss from severe papilledema. Data on demographics, symptoms, visual function, and TSS were collected. The paired Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare changes in visual acuity (VA) and visual field mean deviation (VFMD) between the baseline and most recent visits.Results Of 435 patients with IIH, 15 (13 women) met inclusion criteria. After TSS, ICP-lowering pharmacotherapy was discontinued in 10 patients and decreased in 4; one patient was not on ICP-lowering medication before TSS. All patients experienced resolution or improvement of symptoms (10 resolution, 4 improved, 1 asymptomatic before TSS) and papilledema (11 resolution, 4 improved) after stenting. Papilledema resolution was confirmed with optical coherence tomography-measured peripapillary nerve fibre layer thickness (median decrease 147 μm, interquartile range 41.8 – 242.8, p<0.001). Change in VA between the baseline and most recent visit was not significant, but VFMD improved significantly after stenting (median increase 3.0, IQR 2.0 – 4.2, p<0.001). No patient developed transverse sinus restenosis nor in-stent thrombosis postoperatively across a median venogram follow-up of 20.8 weeks (11.3 – 49.8) and no patient required subsequent surgical intervention for IIH.Conclusion In this cohort of patients with IIH and fulminant presentation, medication resistance, or medication intolerance, TSS was an effective and safe treatment modality. Most patients were able to stop ICP-lowering medications while demonstrating striking improvement in symptomatology and visual function.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.