RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Opportunities to Address Specialty Care Deserts and the Digital Divide: VA’s Virtual Hub-and-Spoke Cardiology Clinic
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.10.17.23297184
DO 10.1101/2023.10.17.23297184
A1 Tisdale, Rebecca
A1 Purmal, Colin
A1 Kalwani, Neil
A1 Sandhu, Alexander
A1 Heidenreich, Paul
A1 Zulman, Donna
A1 Hussain, Tanvir
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/24/2023.10.17.23297184.abstract
AB Background Access to specialty care, including cardiology, in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) varies widely across geographic regions. VHA’s clinical resource hub (CRH) model of care offers mostly-virtual specialty care to individuals in low access regions and has recently been implemented in cardiology. How implementation of this predominantly virtual cardiology program affects the reach of cardiology specialty care in VHA is not known. This study describes the association between patient characteristics and use of CRH cardiology care in VHA’s Sierra Pacific region (Northern California, Nevada, and the Pacific Islands).Methods We compared patients who used CRH cardiology services between 7/15/2021 and 3/31/2023 to non-CRH Sierra Pacific cardiology patients, then used multivariate logistic regression to estimate the association between patient-level factors and odds of being a CRH user.Results There were 804 CRH users over the study period with 1,961 CRH encounters, and 19,583 non-CRH users with 83,489 encounters. Among CRH users, 8% were women and 41% were ≥75 years, compared to 5% and 49% respectively among non-CRH users. Similar proportions in both groups were rural (26% for both CRH and non-CRH), highly-disabled (48% CRH, 47% non-CRH), and low-income (21% CRH, 20% non-CRH). In multivariate logistic models, adjusted odds of using CRH were higher for women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.70 [95% CI 1.46-1.98]) and lower for older Veterans (AOR 0.33 for ≥75 [95% CI 0.23-0.48]). Highly rural Veterans also had higher adjusted odds of using CRH (AOR 1.88 [95% CI 1.30-2.69]).Conclusions The Sierra Pacific CRH cardiology program served a disproportionately high number of women and highly rural Veterans and similar proportions of highly-disabled and low-income Veterans as conventional VA care in its first two years of operation. This predominately-virtual model of cardiology care may be an effective strategy for overcoming access barriers for certain individuals, though targeted efforts may be required to reach older Veterans.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Veterans Administration (VA) Office of Academic Affairs Advanced Fellowship in Health Services Research (RT) and by a pilot grant from the VA Palo Alto Center for Innovation to Implementation (RT). Views expressed are those of the authors and the contents do not represent the views of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This analysis was conducted as a clinical operations quality improvement project through the VISN 21 Clinical Resource Hub leadership team and was therefore exempt from IRB approval.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData is not publicly available per VA policy, but relevant code will be shared with VA-based researchers upon request.