RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Different perspectives on Quality in clinical education of physical therapy students – protocol of a scoping review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.10.20.23297304
DO 10.1101/2023.10.20.23297304
A1 Walter, Matthias M
A1 Rogan, Slavko
A1 Schurz, Alexander P
A1 Zinzen, Evert
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/21/2023.10.20.23297304.abstract
AB Background Clinical education (CE) plays a crucial role in physical therapy education, yet there is a notable absence of established quality characteristics for its implementation.Objectives This scoping review aims to elucidate how various stakeholders define and describe the quality of CE in higher education for physical therapy students. Additionally, it seeks to identify commonalities and distinctions in the application of the term “quality” in the context of CE.Methods Peer-reviewed studies encompassing physical therapy students, clinical instructors, lecturers in physical therapy education, physical therapy educational sites, and supervising physical therapists in internships across all clinical fields will be included in the review. A comprehensive search strategy will be employed, utilizing multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ERIC, Education Research Complete, Education Database, and CINAHL. Eligibility screening will be independently conducted by two reviewers. Data extraction will be presented in a tabular or graphical format, aligning with the review’s objectives.Discussion Insights gleaned from this study hold the potential to inform targeted interventions and improvements in CE, ultimately enhancing the learning outcomes and satisfaction of physical therapy students. This endeavor seeks to bridge the existing gap in defining and achieving quality in clinical education within the realm of physical therapy higher education.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesNo datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.