PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hallett, Nutmeg AU - Dickinson, Rachel AU - Eneje, Emachi AU - Dickens, Geoffrey L. TI - Adverse mental health inpatient experiences: Qualitative systematic review of international literature and development of a conceptual framework AID - 10.1101/2023.10.20.23297217 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.10.20.23297217 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/20/2023.10.20.23297217.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/20/2023.10.20.23297217.full AB - Background Trauma is increasingly linked to poor health outcomes. Adverse experiences in mental health inpatient settings can be traumatic and contribute to long-lasting negative effects like post-traumatic stress disorder. However, the full range of relevant experiences is often unaddressed in service design and delivery.Aim To describe the spectrum of negative experiences that people identify while they are inpatients in adult mental health services.Method A systematic literature review was conducted to identify qualitative studies that included people’s subjective negative reports of their inpatient admissions. CINAHL, MEDLINE and PsycINFO were searched from 2000 onwards, alongside a search of Google Scholar. The quality of studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist. Data were synthesised using the ‘best-fit’ framework synthesis approach. A patient and public involvement reference group contributed to the review.Results Studies (111) from 25 countries were included. Adverse mental health inpatient experiences can be conceptualised under three headings: the ecosystem (the physical environment and the resources available, and other people within or influential to that environment); systems (processes and transitions); and the individual (encroachments on autonomy and traumatisation).Conclusions Improved patient experience is associated with improved patient outcomes, and addressing negative experiences could significantly impact patient care. Mental health professionals should strive to create inpatient environments that are supportive, respectful, and safe for patients, which consideration of the adversity framework developed from this review can facilitate.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Research Development Fund, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors