RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Isoniazid preventive therapy during infancy does not adversely effect growth among HIV-exposed uninfected children: secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.10.19.23297259
DO 10.1101/2023.10.19.23297259
A1 Cherkos, Ashenafi S.
A1 LaCourse, Sylvia M.
A1 Enquobahrie, Daniel A.
A1 Escudero, Jaclyn N.
A1 Mecha, Jerphason
A1 Matemo, Daniel
A1 Kinuthia, John
A1 John-Stewart, Grace
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/20/2023.10.19.23297259.abstract
AB Background Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) decreases risk of tuberculosis (TB) disease; impact on long-term infant growth is unknown. In a recent randomized trial (RCT), we assessed IPT effects on infant growth without known TB exposure.Methods The infant TB Infection Prevention Study (iTIPS) trial was a non-blinded RCT among HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants in Kenya. Inclusion criteria included age 6-10 weeks, birthweight ≥2.5 kg, and gestation ≥37 weeks. Infants in the IPT arm received 10 mg/kg isoniazid daily for 12 months, while the control trial received no intervention; post-trial observational follow-up continued through 24 months of age. We used intent-to-treat linear mixed-effects models to compare growth rates (weight-for-age z-score [WAZ] and height-for-age z-score [HAZ]) between trial arms.Results Among 298 infants, 150 were randomized to IPT, 47.6% were females, median birthweight was 3.4 kg (interquartile range [IQR] 3.0-3.7), and 98.3% were breastfed. During the 12-month intervention period and 12-month post-RCT follow-up, WAZ and HAZ declined significantly in all children, with more HAZ decline in male infants. There were no growth differences between trial arms, including in sex-stratified analyses. In longitudinal linear analysis, mean WAZ (β=0.04 [95% CI:-0.14, 0.22]), HAZ (β=0.14 [95% CI:-0.06, 0.34]), and WHZ [β=-0.07 [95% CI:-0.26, 0.11]) z-scores were similar between arms as were WAZ and HAZ growth trajectories. Infants randomized to IPT had higher monthly WHZ increase (β to 24 months 0.02 [95% CI:0.01, 0.04]) than the no-IPT arm.Conclusion IPT administered to HEU infants did not significantly impact growth outcomes in the first two years of life.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31969368/ Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Nairobi/Kenyatta National Hospital Ethics and Research Committee (P571/08/2015), Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital Ethical Review Committee, the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (STUDY00000761), and Kenya Pharmacy and Poisons Board approved the study. Caregivers gave informed consent. An external and independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board monitored adverse events in the parent trial.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData cannot be shared publicly because of ethical restrictions in the informed consent documents and in the approved human subject’s protection plan of the University of Washington and the University of Nairobi/Kenyatta National Hospital Ethics and Research Committee. Data are available from the Global Center for Integrated Health of Women, Adolescents, and Children (Global WACh) Institutional Data Access / Ethics Committee (contact via Sylvia M LaCourse (PI)) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.