PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Charmode, Sundip H.
AU  - Sheikh, Nishat
AU  - Ravi, Satish Kumar
AU  - Mehra, Simmi
TI  - Legal Frameworks Upholding Deceased Individuals’ Rights and Enabling the Use of Cadavers in Anatomy Education and Research: A Systematic Review
AID  - 10.1101/2023.10.19.23297292
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.10.19.23297292
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/20/2023.10.19.23297292.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/20/2023.10.19.23297292.full
AB  - The study of human cadavers is essential for teaching, advanced training, and research in medical and anatomical sciences. Medical institutions, around the globe presently face the scarcity of cadaver supply. For the majority of countries, unclaimed bodies are still the primary source of cadavers despite guidelines issued by the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists which discourage the use of unclaimed bodies. This study aims to conduct a review of the existing national and international laws safeguarding the several rights of a deceased person. The study also reviews the existing anatomy acts (and related acts) across various countries that facilitate cadaver supply for anatomy education and research. According to PRISMA guidelines an online search was publications in four medical databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Google Scholar) was conducted from 1950 till 2022. A research review protocol was registered in PROSPERO prospectively. Using the Mesh terms like cadaver, anatomy education, dead person and rights, body donation program, unclaimed bodies, and anatomy acts. After the application of the eligibility criteria, 149 publications were shortlisted. After review of all the shortlisted articles, laws, and guidelines, using the data extraction checklist prepared by both authors, five (5) international laws; three (3) supreme court case decisions; two (2) high court case decisions; four (4) Indian penal Code Sections and 22 anatomy acts were selected. The review findings will emphasize the distinctions between India’s anatomy acts and those of other developed nations, thereby broadening our perspective as we propose a model anatomy act for uniform implementation across the country with the goal of streamlining the procurement of cadavers.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for publication of this systematic review will be the Learnng rwource allowance of the First author.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript