RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Reanalysis of cluster randomised trial data to account for exposure misclassification using a per-protocol and complier-restricted approach
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.04.20.23288835
DO 10.1101/2023.04.20.23288835
A1 Dufault, Suzanne M.
A1 Tanamas, Stephanie K.
A1 Indriani, Citra
A1 Ahmad, Riris Andono
A1 Utarini, Adi
A1 Jewell, Nicholas P.
A1 Simmons, Cameron P.
A1 Anders, Katherine L.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/11/2023.04.20.23288835.abstract
AB The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis of the Applying Wolbachia to Eliminate Dengue (AWED) trial estimated a protective efficacy of 77.1% for participants resident in areas randomised to receive releases of wMel-infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, an emerging dengue preventive intervention. The limiting assumptions of ITT analyses in cluster randomised trials and the mobility of mosquitoes and humans across cluster boundaries indicate the primary analysis is likely to underestimate the full public health benefit. Using spatiotemporally-resolved data on the distribution of Wolbachia mosquitoes and on the mobility of AWED participants (n = 6,306), we perform complier-restricted and per-protocol re-examinations of the efficacy of the Wolbachia intervention. Increased intervention efficacy was estimated in all analyses by the refined exposure measures. The complier-restricted analysis returned an estimated efficacy of 80.7% (95% CI: 65.9, 89.0) and the per-protocol analysis estimated 82.7% (71.7, 88.4) efficacy when comparing participants with an estimated wMel exposure of ≥ 80% compared to those with <20%. These reanalyses demonstrate how human and mosquito movement can lead to underestimation of intervention effects in trials of vector interventions and indicate that the protective efficacy of Wolbachia is even higher than reported in the primary trial results.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT03055585Funding StatementWe gratefully acknowledge the Tahija Foundation as funders of the AWED trial, and the Wellcome Trust and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which provided financial support to the World Mosquito Program.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The trial protocol for the Applying Wolbachia to Eliminate Dengue (AWED) trial study was approved by the Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) ethics committee (approval number KE/FK/105/EC/2016) and Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number 0960). Written informed consent was obtained from participants (or their guardian where the participant is a minor). In addition, participants between 13 and 17 years of age were invited to sign a consent form indicating that they understood the research and agreed to participate.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes