RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Behavioral and structural barriers to human post-exposure prophylaxis and other preventive practices during a canine rabies epidemic
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.01.16.20016394
DO 10.1101/2020.01.16.20016394
A1 Castillo-Neyra, Ricardo
A1 Buttenheim, Alison M.
A1 Brown, Joanna
A1 Ferrara, James F.
A1 Arevalo-Nieto, Claudia
A1 Borrini-Mayorí, Katty
A1 Levy, Michael Z.
A1 Becerra, Victor
A1 Paz-Soldan, Valerie A.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/01/20/2020.01.16.20016394.abstract
AB A canine rabies epidemic started in early 2015 in Arequipa, Peru; the rabies virus continues to circulate in the dog population. Some city residents who suffer dog bites do not seek care or do not complete indicated post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimens, increasing the risk of human rabies. The objectives of our study were to qualitatively assess knowledge about rabies, and preventive practices, such as PEP vaccination, following a dog bite. We conducted eight focus group discussions in peri-urban and urban communities with 70 total participants. We observed low awareness of rabies severity and fatality. Participants, especially those in per-urban communities, recounted applying herbs or the hair of the dog that bit them to wounds rather than seeking appropriate care. Misconceptions about rabies vaccines and mistreatment at health centers also commonly prevents initiating or completing PEP vaccination. We identify important behavioral and structural barriers and knowledge gaps that limit evidence-based preventive strategies against rabies and may threaten successful prevention of dog-mediated human rabies in this setting.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (grant number R01HD075869). RCN was partially supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant number (1K01AI139284). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available. https://github.com/chirimacha/Rabies_PEP_qualitative_spatial_inequalities