RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Relational One Health: a more-than-biomedical framework for more-than-human health, and lessons learned from Brazil, Ethiopia, and Israel
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.10.10.23296827
DO 10.1101/2023.10.10.23296827
A1 Meisner, Julianne
A1 McLeland-Wieser, Hilary
A1 Traylor, Elizabeth E.
A1 Hermesh, Barak
A1 Berg, Tabata
A1 Roess, Amira
A1 Van Patter, Lauren
A1 Rosenthal, Anat
A1 Davidovitch, Nadav
A1 Rabinowitz, Peter M.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/10/2023.10.10.23296827.abstract
AB The One Health conceptual framework envisions human, animal, and environmental health as interconnected. This framework has achieved remarkable progress in the control of zoonotic diseases, but it commonly neglects the environmental domain, implicitly prioritizes human life over the life of other beings, and fails to consider the political, cultural, social, historical, and economic contexts that shape the health of multispecies collectives. We have developed a novel theoretical framework, Relational One Health, which expands the boundaries of One Health, clearly defines the environmental domain, and provides an avenue for engagement with critical theory. We present a systematic literature review of One Health frameworks to demonstrate the novelty of Relational One Health, and to orient it with respect to other critically-engaged frameworks for One Health. Our results indicate that while Relational One Health complements several earlier frameworks, these other frameworks are either not intended for research, or for narrow sets of research questions. We then demonstrate the utility of Relational One Health for One Health research through case studies in Brazil, Israel, and Ethiopia. Empirical research which is grounded in theory can speak collectively, increasing the impact of individual studies and the field as a whole. One Health is uniquely poised to address several wicked challenges facing the 21st century—climate change, pandemics, neglected zoonoses, and biodiversity collapse—and a unifying theoretical tradition is key to generating the evidence needed to meet these challenges.HIGHLIGHTSOne Health views human, animal, and environmental health as interconnectedBiomedical reductionism in One Health has resulted in a focus on human health threats from animalsThe environmental domain and more-than-biomedical contexts are commonly ignored in One HealthRelational One Health is a new theoretical framework which addresses these limitationsThis theoretical framework is relevant to all One Health research, increasing the field’s impactCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThis article presents a scoping review, thus all relevant data are included in the manuscript itself