PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Fedele, Giorgio AU - Hill, Graham AU - Sweetford, Amelia AU - Lee, Suki AU - Yau, Bobby AU - Caputo, Domenico R. AU - Grovewood, Denise AU - Dahir, Rowda AU - Ruiz-Dana, Paula Esquivias AU - Wisniewska, Anika AU - Di Biase, Anna AU - Gibson, Miles AU - Percival, Benita AU - Grujic, Stefan AU - Fraser, Donald P. TI - Development and validation of automated methods for COVID-19 PCR MasterMix preparation AID - 10.1101/2023.10.04.23296537 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.10.04.23296537 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/05/2023.10.04.23296537.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/05/2023.10.04.23296537.full AB - Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-based assays were widely deployed during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for population-scale testing. High-throughput molecular diagnostic labora-tories required a high degree of process automation to cope with huge testing demand, fast turn-around times and quality requirements. However, the critical step of preparing a PCR MasterMix has often been neglected by process developers and optimisers, and is largely dependent upon operator skill for the manual pipetting of reagents to construct the PCR MasterMix. Dependence on manual procedures introduces variation, inconsistency, wastage and potentially risks data integrity. To address this issue, we developed a liquid-handler based solution for automated, traceable and compliant PCR MasterMix preparation. Here, we show that a fully automated PCR MasterMix protocol can substitute manual pipetting, without affecting clinical calling, accuracy or precision. Ultimately, this method reduced cost-per-test at a high-throughput laboratory by eliminating operator-induced wastage while improving the quality of results.Competing Interest StatementD.G. is at the time of writing an employee of SPT Labtech Limited, but their contributions to the project occurred during their employment by UKHSA. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.Funding StatementThis work was financially supported by the UK Department of Health and Social Care through the Test and Trace programme.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Tom Fowler (Director of Public Health Testing for COVID-19) of The UK Health Security Agency waived ethical approval for this work. Nicholas Moiseiwitsch (Deputy to Programme Director at Rosalind Franklin Laboratory) of the UK Health Security Agency gave approval for the work to be published.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon approval of a freedom of information request to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). Liquid Handler methods are freely available in a GitHub repository. https://github.com/Donald-OMIX/Liquid_Handler_Methods