RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Genomic epidemiology and longitudinal sampling of ward wastewater environments and patients reveals complexity of the transmission dynamics of blaKPC-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in a hospital setting JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.11.26.21266267 DO 10.1101/2021.11.26.21266267 A1 Stoesser, N A1 George, R A1 Aiken, Z A1 Phan, HTT A1 Lipworth, S A1 Wyllie, DH A1 Quan, TP A1 Mathers, AJ A1 De Maio, N A1 Seale, AC A1 Eyre, DW A1 Vaughan, A A1 Swann, J A1 Peto, TEA A1 Crook, DW A1 Cawthorne, J A1 Dodgson, A A1 Walker, AS A1 , YR 2023 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/04/2021.11.26.21266267.abstract AB Healthcare-associated wastewater reservoirs and asymptomatic gastrointestinal patient colonisation by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) contribute to nosocomial CPE dissemination. We systematically sampled wastewater sites (n=4488 sampling events; 349 sites) and patients (n=1247) across six wards over 6-12 months in 2016 to better understand blaKPC-associated CPE (KPC-E) diversity within these niches and transmission potential in an endemic healthcare setting. Up to five isolates in KPC-E-positive samples were sequenced (Illumina). Recombination-adjusted phylogenies were used to define genetically related strains; assembly and mapping-based typing approaches were used to characterise antimicrobial resistance genes, insertion sequences, and Tn4401 types/target site sequences. The wider accessory genome was evaluated in a subset of the largest clusters, and those crossing niches.Wastewater site KPC-E-positivity was substantial (101/349 sites [28.9%] positive); 228/5,601 (4.1%) patients cultured were CPE culture-positive over the same timeframe. At a genomic-level, 13 KPC-E species and 109 strains were identified, and 24% of wastewater and 26% of patient KPC-E-positive samples harboured ≥1 strain. Most diversity was explained by the individual niche, suggesting localised factors are important in selection and spread. Tn4401+target site sequence diversity was greater in wastewater sites (p<0.001), which might favour Tn4401-associated transposition/evolution. Shower/bath and sluice/mop-associated sites were more likely to be KPC-E-positive (Adjusted Odds Ratio [95% CI]: 2.69 [1.44-5.01], p=0.0019 and 2.60 [1.04-6.52], p=0.0410, respectively). Different strains had different transmission and blaKPC dissemination dynamics.There may be substantial KPC-E colonisation of wastewater sites and patients in KPC-E-endemic healthcare settings. Niche-specific factors (e.g. microbial interactions, selection pressure) likely affect carbapenemase gene persistence and evolution, and different strains and mobile genetic elements with different transmission dynamics influence carbapenemase gene dissemination; these factors should be considered in surveillance and control strategies.Competing Interest StatementDavid W. Eyre has received lecture fees from Gilead, outside the submitted work.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance (NIHR200915), a partnership between the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and the University of Oxford, and was supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The computational aspects of this research were funded from the NIHR Oxford BRC with additional support from the Wellcome Trust Core Award Grant Number 203141/Z/16/Z. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR, UKHSA or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was performed as part of a Trust board-approved and UK Health Security Agency (formerly Public Health England) long-term outbreak response, and ethics approval was not required under NHS governance arrangements; all analyses were undertaken using anonymised data. This was reviewed and agreed by the Joint Research Office of the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Oxford (who oversee research governance, ethics and assurance for our institution), and who deemed that neither sponsorship nor research ethics review was required.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors confirm all sequencing data and available metadata has been provided in NCBI BioProjects PRJNA768622 and PRJNA514245 and in supplementary dataset 2.