PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Mistry, Akshitkumar M.
AU  - Saver, Jeffrey
AU  - Mack, William
AU  - Kamel, Hooman
AU  - Elm, Jordan
AU  - Beall, Jonathan
TI  - Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Trials: Cutting, Sliding, or Keeping mRS Scores and WFNS Grades
AID  - 10.1101/2023.09.28.23296257
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.09.28.23296257
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/02/2023.09.28.23296257.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/02/2023.09.28.23296257.full
AB  - Rigorous evidence generation with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has lagged for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) compared to other forms of acute stroke. Besides its lower incidence compared to other stroke subtypes, the presentation and outcome of SAH patients also differ. This must be considered and adjusted for in designing pivotal RCTs of SAH patients. Here, we show the effect of the unique expected distribution of the SAH severity at presentation (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons, WFNS, grade) on the outcome most used in pivotal stroke RCTs (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) and consequently on the sample size. Further, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different options to analyze the outcome and control the expected distribution of WFNS grades in addition to showing their effects on the sample size. Last, we offer methods that investigators can adapt to more precisely understand the effect of common mRS analysis methods and trial eligibility pertaining to the WFNS grade in designing their large-scale SAH RCTs.Purpose The generation of rigorous evidence to inform the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has lagged other types of acute strokes. The reason for this lag is multifactorial—one being that SAH has the lowest incidence of all forms of stroke. However, the paucity of SAH randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can also be self-exacerbating. Rather than adopting existing trial designs and biostatistical methods, it forces new investigators to craft these anew. Here, we provide a basic biostatistical guide for investigators to navigate two foundational dilemmas in designing large-scale SAH RCTs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by NIH/NINDS U01NS087748 (J.E. and J.B.)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.