PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Daniel, Jeremiah Oluwatomi Itodo
AU  - Sulaiman, Abdulmuizz Oluwatomi
AU  - Isiakpona, Chiwendu
AU  - Igoli, Joanne
AU  - Chukwumaeze, Chukwunonso Emmanuel
AU  - Morgan, Eghosa
AU  - Olukoya, Olatomiwa
TI  - Assessing Folic Acid Supplementation Adherence Among Pregnant Women in LMICs and its Impact on Neural Tube Defect Incidence: A Systematic Review Protocol
AID  - 10.1101/2023.09.26.23296200
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.09.26.23296200
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/27/2023.09.26.23296200.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/27/2023.09.26.23296200.full
AB  - Introduction Neural tube defects (NTDs) are treatable but incurable birth defects, causing permanent disability and potential mortality if neglected. Despite its global significance, there has not been any systematic review exploring the link between folic acid adherence and NTD incidence in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), where its impact is disproportionately felt. This systematic review primarily aims to analyze the impact of folic acid supplementation adherence among expectant mothers on the incidence of NTDs in LMICs.Methods and Analysis Following the PRISMA guidelines, we will conduct a comprehensive search of original research articles and observational studies using the electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, Medline, and Embase from inception till date. Our search comprises keywords related to our PICO framework and objectives. We will analyze data using tables and diagrams for qualitative presentation and conduct a random-effect Bayesian meta-analysis when applicable.Two reviewers will screen titles and abstracts independently, conduct full-text reviews, and extract study data. In case of disagreements, a third reviewer will resolve them. We will present study details and assess bias risk. We will also assess the overall certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.Ethics and Dissemination Ethical approval is unnecessary as this study involves a systematic review of published studies. We aim to publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding; however, the authors bear the research costs.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:PubMed:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ Scopus:https://www.scopus.com/ Ovid Medline:https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ Embase: https://www.embase.com/landing?status=greyI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data found in this research protocol are available at PubMed:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ Scopus:https://www.scopus.com/ Ovid Medline:https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ Embase: https://www.embase.com/landing?status=grey