PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Pakizer, David
AU  - Kozel, Jiří
AU  - Taffé, Patrick
AU  - Elmers, Jolanda
AU  - Feber, Janusz
AU  - Michel, Patrik
AU  - Školoudík, David
AU  - Sirimarco, Gaia
TI  - Diagnostic Accuracy of Carotid Plaque Instability by Noninvasive Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2023.09.25.23296124
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.09.25.23296124
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/26/2023.09.25.23296124.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/26/2023.09.25.23296124.full
AB  - Background There is increasing evidence that plaque instability in the extracranial carotid artery may lead to an increased stroke risk independently of the degree of stenosis. We aimed to determine diagnostic accuracy of vulnerable and stable plaque using noninvasive imaging modalities when compared to histology in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis.Methods Medline Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in the detection of 1) vulnerable/stable plaque, and 2) vulnerable/stable plaque characteristics, compared to histology. The quality of included studies was assessed by QUADAS-2 and univariate and bivariate random-effect meta-analyses were performed.Results We included 36 vulnerable and 5 stable plaque studies in the meta-analysis, and out of 211 plaque characteristics from remaining studies, we classified 169 as vulnerable and 42 as stable characteristics (28 CT, 120 MRI, 104 US characteristics). We found that MRI had high accuracy (90% [95% CI:82–95%]) in the detection of vulnerable plaque, similar to CT (86% [95% CI:76–92%]; p>0.05), whereas US showed less accuracy (80% [95% CI:75– 84%]; p=0.013). CT showed a high diagnostic accuracy to visualize characteristics of vulnerable or stable plaques (89% and 90%) similar to MRI (86% and 89%; p>0.05); however US had lower accuracy (77%, p<0.001 and 82%, p>0.05).Conclusions CT and MRI have a similar, high performance to detect vulnerable carotid plaques, whereas US showed significantly less diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, MRI visualized all vulnerable plaque characteristics allowing for a better stroke risk assessment.Registration PROSPERO ID CRD42022329690 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=329690)Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialPROSPERO ID CRD42022329690 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=329690)Funding StatementDavid Pakizer was supported by VIA PhD grant University of Ostrava for travel related to this analysis. Statistical analysis was supported by grants NV19-04-00270, NU22-04-00389, SGS11/LF/2022; and by University of Lausanne, Faculty of Biology and Medicine.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NAI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesDetailed statistical analyses, major resources tables and figures can be found in the Supplemental Material. All material, data, and detailed protocols are available upon request.IPHintraplaque hemorrhageLRNClipid-rich necrotic coreUSultrasoundPRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysesSTARDStandards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesQUADASQuality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesHSROChierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic