PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Eromosele, Oseiwe B.
AU  - Sobodu, Temitope
AU  - Olayinka, Olakeyede
AU  - Ouyang, David
TI  - Racial Disparities in Knowledge of Cardiovascular Disease by a Chat-Based Artificial Intelligence Model
AID  - 10.1101/2023.09.20.23295874
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.09.20.23295874
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/25/2023.09.20.23295874.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/25/2023.09.20.23295874.full
AB  - Background Patients and their families often explore the information available online for information about health status. A dialogue-based artificial intelligence (AI) language model (ChatGPT) has been developed for complex question and answer. We sought to assess whether AI model had knowledge of cardiovascular disease (CVD) racial disparities, including disparities associated with CVD risk factors and associated diseases.Methods To assess ChatGPT’s responses to topic in cardiovascular disease disparities, we created six questions of twenty sets, with each set consisting of three questions with changes to text prompt based on differences in patient demographics. Each question was asked three times to assess variability in responses.Results A total of 180 responses were tabulated from ChatGPT’s responses to 60 questions asked in triplicate to assess. Despite some variation in wording, all responses to the same prompt were consistent across different sessions. ChatGPT’s responses to 63.4% of the questions (38 out of 60 questions) were appropriate, 33.3% (20 out of 60 questions) were inappropriate and 3.3% unreliable (2 out of 60 questions). Of the 180 prompt entries into ChatGPT, 141 (78.3%) were correct, 28 (15.5%) were hedging or indeterminate responses that could not be binarized into a correct or incorrect response, and 11 (6.1%) were incorrect. There were consistent themes in incorrect or hedging responses by ChatGPT, with 91% and 79% of incorrect and hedging responses related to a cardiovascular disease disparity that affects a minority or underserved racial group.Conclusion Our study showed that an online chat-based AI model has a broad knowledge of CVD racial disparities, however persistent gaps in knowledge about minority groups. Given that these models might be used by the general public, caution should be advised in taking responses at face value.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesNone