RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Converting between the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Urinary Subscales: Modeling and External Validation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.09.20.23295834
DO 10.1101/2023.09.20.23295834
A1 Windisch, Paul
A1 Becker, Ivo
A1 Tang, Hongjian
A1 Schröder, Christina
A1 Buchali, André
A1 Aebersold, Daniel M.
A1 Zwahlen, Daniel R.
A1 Förster, Robert
A1 Shelan, Mohamed
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/22/2023.09.20.23295834.abstract
AB Background The 50-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) are two widely used options to assess prostate-related quality of life (QoL), but there is no method to convert between the two. We, therefore, developed and externally validated models for this purpose.Methods 347 consecutive patients who had previously received radiotherapy and surgery for prostate cancer at two institutions in Switzerland and Germany were contacted via mail and instructed to complete both questionnaires. The Swiss cohort was used to train and internally validate different machine learning models using 4-fold cross-validation. The German cohort was used for external validation.Results Converting between the EPIC Urinary Irritative/Obstructive subscale and the IPSS using linear regressions resulted in mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 3.88 and 6.12 below the respective previously published minimal important differences (MIDs) of 5.2 and 10 points. Converting between the EPIC Urinary Summary and the IPSS was less accurate with MAEs of 5.13 and 10.45, similar to the MIDs. More complex model architectures did not result in improved performance.Conclusions Linear regressions can be used to convert between the IPSS and the EPIC Urinary subscales. While the equations obtained in this study can be used to compare results across clinical trials, they should not be used to inform clinical decision-making in individual patients.Competing Interest StatementP.W. has a patent application entitled "Method for detection of neurological abnormalities" outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.Funding StatementNo funding was received for this project. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional review board approval was obtained from the ethical review committee of the canton of Zurich for a project (project number: BASEC 2020-02112) to analyze the effects and side effects of radiotherapy at our institution (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05192876). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data and code used to obtain the results of this study have been uploaded to https://github.com/windisch-paul/EPIC-IPSS-converter. https://github.com/windisch-paul/EPIC-IPSS-converter