PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Siggs, Owen M
AU  - Awadalla, Mona S
AU  - Souzeau, Emmanuelle
AU  - Staffieri, Sandra E
AU  - Kearns, Lisa S
AU  - Laurie, Kate
AU  - Kuot, Abraham
AU  - Qassim, Ayub
AU  - Edwards, Thomas L
AU  - Coote, Michael A
AU  - Mancel, Erica
AU  - Walland, Mark J
AU  - Dondey, Joanne
AU  - Galanopoulous, Anna
AU  - Casson, Robert J
AU  - Mills, Richard A
AU  - MacArthur, Daniel G
AU  - Ruddle, Jonathan B
AU  - Burdon, Kathryn P
AU  - Craig, Jamie E
TI  - The genetic and clinical landscape of nanophthalmos in an Australian cohort
AID  - 10.1101/19013599
DP  - 2019 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 19013599
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/12/04/19013599.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/12/04/19013599.full
AB  - Purpose Refractive error is caused by a disparity between the axial length and focusing power of the eye. Nanophthalmos is a rare ocular abnormality in which both eyes are abnormally small, typically causing extreme hyperopic refractive error, and associated with an increased risk of angle-closure glaucoma.Methods A cohort of 40 individuals from 13 unrelated nanophthalmos kindreds were recruited, with 11 probands subjected to exome sequencing.Results Nine probands (69.2%) were assigned a genetic diagnosis, with variants in PRSS56 (4), MFRP (3), and previously reported variants in TMEM98 (1) and MYRF (1). Two of the four PRSS56 probands harboured the previously described c.1066dupC frameshift variant implicated in over half of all reported PRSS56 kindreds, with surrounding haplotypes distinct from each other, and from a previously reported Tunisian c.1066dupC haplotype. Individuals with a genetic diagnosis had shorter mean axial lengths (P=7.22×10−9) and more extreme hyperopia (P=0.0005) than those without a genetic diagnosis, with recessive forms associated with the shortest axial lengths and highest hyperopia. All individuals with an axial length below 18 mm in their smaller eye (17/17) were assigned a genetic diagnosis.Conclusions These findings detail the genetic architecture of nanophthalmos in an Australian cohort of predominantly European ancestry, their relative clinical phenotypes, and highlight the shared genetic architecture of rare and common disorders of refractive error.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSupported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC APP1107098), the Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia, and Flinders University. KPB was funded by an NHMRC Career Development Award, and JEC by an NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship. DGM was supported in part by the National Human Genome Research Institute, the National Eye Institute, and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute grant UM1 HG008900, and by the National Human Genome Research Institute grant R01 HG009141.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAnonymized data can be made available upon request.