PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Jamthikar, Ankush D. AU - Shah, Rohan AU - Tokodi, Marton AU - Sengupta, Partho P. AU - Yanamala, Naveena TI - Analyzing the Mechanism Behind Age-agnostic Prediction of Diastolic Dysfunction Using Echocardiography Variables in Deep Neural Networks AID - 10.1101/2023.09.17.23295672 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.09.17.23295672 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/17/2023.09.17.23295672.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/17/2023.09.17.23295672.full AB - Objective This investigation delved into the inner workings of previously published Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) designed to detect changes in diastolic function related to age using echocardiographic parameters. The primary goal was to decipher the predictive mechanism and determine whether biological age and gender played concealed roles within the DNN model.Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of a previously published DNN model that was trained using data from 1,009 patients (average age: 62±17 years, 57% females) to forecast risk phenogroups based on nine echocardiographic parameters. This model was assessed on both an internal cohort (n=243, mean age = 62 ± 17 years, ∼57% females) and an external validation cohort (n=5596, mean age = 76 ± 5 years, ∼57% females). To forecast biological age and gender, we developed linear regression and classification models employing hidden layer activations from the DNN. Model performance was assessed using Pearson’s correlation for regression, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) metrics for classification.Results Upon scrutinizing the hidden layer activations, we observed that the model accurately captured biological age in both younger and older populations, particularly in low-risk phenogroups, with robust correlations for the entire population (0.94, p<0.001), males (0.90, p<0.001), and females (0.94, p<0.001). In high-risk phenogroups, the correlations were lower, standing at 0.31 (p=0.274) for the entire population, 0.76 (p=0.003) for males, and 0.11 (p=0.723) for females. Predicting gender as an underlying factor resulted in an accuracy rate of 58.02% and 52.27%, accompanied by an AUC of 0.65 for both validation cohorts.Conclusion This study underscores that the latent space within DNNs maintains a link with age in relation to diastolic functional parameters, offering a solution that is independent of age for predicting diastolic dysfunction. The dissection of the network can further enhance our comprehension of the information learned by DNNs, thereby providing novel pathophysiological insights for medical professionals.Competing Interest StatementDr. Sengupta is a consultant for RCE Technologies, Echo IQ. Dr. Yanamala is an advisor to Turnkey Learning, LLC and Turnkey Learning (P) Ltd, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.Funding StatementNAAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol has been approved by the institutional review boards of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, West Virginia University School of Medicine, and ARIC database recruiting centers.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors