PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Palumaa, Teele AU - Linntam, Delis AU - Rebane, Reili AU - Tammaru, Marika AU - Palumaa, Kadi TI - Investigating potential myopia risk factors, including chronotype, in Estonian adolescents AID - 10.1101/2023.09.12.23294974 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.09.12.23294974 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/12/2023.09.12.23294974.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/12/2023.09.12.23294974.full AB - Purpose To evaluate chronotype, lifestyle factors, and parental myopia in relation to myopia, and characterise the effect of cycloplegia on spherical equivalent refraction (SER) in Estonian secondary school students.Methods One hundred twenty-three students aged between 15 and 17 years from three secondary schools in Estonia participated in the study. They underwent a comprehensive ocular examination, including cycloplegic refraction and ocular biometry. Chronotype was evaluated with the Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire. Participants also completed a questionnaire about their daily activities, including time spent outdoors, time spent on near-work and mid-working distance activities, and parental myopia. Myopia was defined as cycloplegic SER ≤–0.50 D. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association of the studied factors with myopia.Results In a multivariate regression model, having two myopic parents was associated with higher odds of myopia (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.15–12.42). We found no association between myopia and chronotype. Notably, time spent outdoors, and doing near-work and mid-working distance activities, did not affect the likelihood of having myopia. Non-cycloplegic SER was significantly more myopic than cycloplegic SER on average by 0.86 D (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test).Conclusion Consistent with previous reports, we identified parental myopia as a myopia risk factor. Chronotype was not associated with myopia in our study sample. Interestingly, there was no association between myopia and time spent outdoors or near work. Using non-cycloplegic refraction would lead to a significant overestimation of myopia.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Tallinn Medical Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.CIconfidence intervalDdioptreMEQMorningness-Eveningness QuestionnaireORodds ratioSDstandard deviationSERspherical equivalent refraction