PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Fass, Stuart B. AU - Mulvey, Bernard AU - Yang, Wei AU - Selmanovic, Din AU - Chaturvedi, Sneha AU - Tycksen, Eric AU - Weiss, Lauren A. AU - Dougherty, Joseph D. TI - Relationship between sex biases in gene expression and sex biases in autism and Alzheimer’s disease AID - 10.1101/2023.08.29.23294773 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.08.29.23294773 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/01/2023.08.29.23294773.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/01/2023.08.29.23294773.full AB - Sex differences in the brain may play an important role in sex-differential prevalence of neuropsychiatric conditions. In order to understand the transcriptional basis of sex differences, we analyzed multiple, large-scale, human postmortem brain RNA-seq datasets using both within-region and pan-regional frameworks. We find evidence of sex-biased transcription in many autosomal genes, some of which provide evidence for pathways and cell population differences between chromosomally male and female individuals. These analyses also highlight regional differences in the extent of sex-differential gene expression. We observe an increase in specific neuronal transcripts in male brains and an increase in immune and glial function-related transcripts in female brains. Integration with single-cell data suggests this corresponds to sex differences in cellular states rather than cell abundance. Integration with case-control gene expression studies suggests a female molecular predisposition towards Alzheimer’s disease, a female-biased disease. Autism, a male-biased diagnosis, does not exhibit a male predisposition pattern in our analysis. Finally, we provide region specific analyses of sex differences in brain gene expression to enable additional studies at the interface of gene expression and diagnostic differences.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the SFARI foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Washington University Instutional Review Board made a determination that this was not human subjects research since all the samples came from the deceased.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesNo data were produced for this study - it was a reanlaysis of existing data sources.