RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Community gender systems and daughter’s risk of female genital mutilation/cutting: New theory and application to Egypt
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 19005520
DO 10.1101/19005520
A1 Yount, Kathryn M.
A1 Cheong, Yuk Fai
A1 James-Hawkins, Laurie
A1 Grose, Rose Grace
A1 Hayford, Sarah R.
YR 2019
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/10/18/19005520.abstract
AB We proposed and tested a feminist social-ecological theory about daughters’ experience of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGMC) in Egypt, where over 90% of women ages 15–49 are cut. FGMC has potential adverse effects on demographic and health outcomes and has been defined as a human-rights violation. Contextual factors are important determinants of FGMC, but an integrated theory is lacking, and quantitative multilevel research is limited. We theorized that more favorable community-level gender systems, including gender norms opposing FGMC and expanded opportunities for women outside of the family, would be associated with a daughter’s lower risk of FGMC and would strengthen the negative association of a mother’s opposition to FGMC with her daughter’s risk of cutting. Using a national sample of 14,171 mother-daughter dyads from the 2014 Egypt Demographic and Health Survey, we estimated multilevel discrete-time hazard models to test these relationships. Community gender norms opposing FGMC had significant direct, negative associations with the hazard that a daughter was cut, but women’s opportunities outside the family did not. Maternal opposition to FGMC was negatively associated with cutting a daughter, and these associations were stronger where community opposition to FGMC and opportunities for women were greater. Results provided good support for a gender-systems theory of the multilevel influences on FGMC. Integrated, multilevel interventions that address gender norms about FGMC and opportunities for women in the community, as well as beliefs about the practice among the mothers of at-risk daughters may be needed for sustainable declines in the practice.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was supported by research grant 1R21HD086762-01/02 (PIs Yount and Hayford). Funding also was received from the National Center on HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Health Resources and Service Administration in support of the Health Policy Leadership Fellowship in the Satcher Health Leadership Institute at Morehouse School of Medicine; and Ohio State University’s Institute for Population Research (P2c-HD058484).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.Not ApplicableAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableThis study is based on an analysis of secondary, deidentified data that is publicly available by request at the link, below. https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm