RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Developing and Evaluating Pediatric Phecodes (Peds-Phecodes) for High-Throughput Phenotyping Using Electronic Health Records
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.08.22.23294435
DO 10.1101/2023.08.22.23294435
A1 Grabowska, Monika E.
A1 Van Driest, Sara L.
A1 Robinson, Jamie R.
A1 Patrick, Anna E.
A1 Guardo, Chris
A1 Gangireddy, Srushti
A1 Ong, Henry
A1 Feng, QiPing
A1 Carroll, Robert
A1 Kannankeril, Prince J.
A1 Wei, Wei-Qi
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/24/2023.08.22.23294435.abstract
AB Objective Pediatric patients have different diseases and outcomes than adults; however, existing phecodes do not capture the distinctive pediatric spectrum of disease. We aim to develop specialized pediatric phecodes (Peds-Phecodes) to enable efficient, large-scale phenotypic analyses of pediatric patients.Materials and Methods We adopted a hybrid data- and knowledge-driven approach leveraging electronic health records (EHRs) and genetic data from Vanderbilt University Medical Center to modify the most recent version of phecodes to better capture pediatric phenotypes. First, we compared the prevalence of patient diagnoses in pediatric and adult populations to identify disease phenotypes differentially affecting children and adults. We then used clinical domain knowledge to remove phecodes representing phenotypes unlikely to affect pediatric patients and create new phecodes for phenotypes relevant to the pediatric population. We further compared phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) outcomes replicating known pediatric genotype-phenotype associations between Peds-Phecodes and phecodes.Results The Peds-Phecodes aggregate 15,533 ICD-9-CM codes and 82,949 ICD-10-CM codes into 2,051 distinct phecodes. Peds-Phecodes replicated more known pediatric genotype-phenotype associations than phecodes (248 versus 192 out of 687 SNPs, p<0.001).Discussion We introduce Peds-Phecodes, a high-throughput EHR phenotyping tool tailored for use in pediatric populations. We successfully validated the Peds-Phecodes using genetic replication studies. Our findings also reveal the potential use of Peds-Phecodes in detecting novel genotype-phenotype associations for pediatric conditions. We expect that Peds-Phecodes will facilitate large-scale phenomic and genomic analyses in pediatric populations.Conclusion Peds-Phecodes capture higher-quality pediatric phenotypes and deliver superior PheWAS outcomes compared to phecodes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded under National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal and Pediatric Precision in Therapeutics (MPRINT) grant NIH P50HD106446, National Institute on Aging (NIA) F30AG080885, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R01GM139891 and T32GM007347, National Library of Medicine (NLM) R01LM012806, National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) U01HG011181, and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) K08AR081405. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of Vanderbilt University Medical Center waived ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors and subsequent institutional approval. https://wei-lab.app.vumc.org/phecode-data/pediatric_phecodes https://wei-lab.app.vumc.org/phecode-data/phecodes