PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Kim, Min-Jeong AU - Kim, Sunmie AU - Kim, Jin Ju AU - Kim, Young Sun AU - Song, Ji Hyun AU - Lee, Jung Eun AU - Youn, Jiyoung AU - Yang, Sun Young TI - Dietary Intake Is Associated With the Prevalence of Uterine Leiomyoma in Korean Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study AID - 10.1101/2023.08.23.23294524 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.08.23.23294524 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/24/2023.08.23.23294524.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/24/2023.08.23.23294524.full AB - Objective Uterine leiomyoma (UL), the most prevalent benign gynecologic tumor among reproductive-aged women, lacks sufficient research on the potential association between dietary intake and its occurrence in Korean women. Addressing this research gap, this study aims to evaluate the potential link between dietary intake and the prevalence of UL in Korean women.Methods In this cross-sectional study, a cohort of 672 women, aged 25 to 65, were enrolled, with 383 (57%) being premenopausal. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and UL presence was determined through ultrasonography. The analysis focused exclusively on items within ten categories, including vegetables/fruit, vegetables, fruits, red meat, processed meat, poultry, fish, dairy product, milk, and alcohol. Multiple logistic regression models were employed to explore the relationship between dietary intake and the prevalence of UL, calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) while adjusting for confounding factors.Results Within the total cohort, 219 (32.6%) women were diagnosed with UL. High intakes of fish and poultry showed an association with higher UL prevalence. Odds ratios (95% CIs) for the upper quartiles compared to the lower quartiles were 1.70 (1.02-2.84; p trend = 0.049) for fish intake and 1.85 (1.09 -3.14; p trend = 0.07) for poultry intake. Conversely, an inverse relationship emerged between dairy product intake and UL prevalence, with an odds ratio of 0.59 (95% CI 0.36–0.98; p trend = 0.06). Stratifying the analysis by menopausal status revealed a parallel pattern, with heightened UL prevalence with fish intake and reduced prevalence with dairy product intake. However, the link between poultry intake and UL prevalence was primarily observed among postmenopausal women. Among premenopausal women, elevated vegetable intake was linked to a decreased UL prevalence (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.22-1.01 for top vs. bottom quartiles; p trend = 0.01).Conclusion We found that high consumption of fish and poultry, coupled with low intake of dairy products, correlated with an elevated prevalence of UL. Furthermore, vegetable intake exhibited an inverse relationship with UL prevalence, particularly among premenopausal women.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of the Seoul National University Hospital approved the study (15 Apr 2015, H-1504-034-662). As per the suggestions provided by the editorial team, I have incorporated the mentioned information into the Material and Method section line 125-132 of the paper. “This study was approved and has been granted an exemption from the requirement for additional consent procedures by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of this institution. This exemption is based on the fact that the study involves the analysis of medical records from women who underwent pelvic ultrasound examinations among the participants of a previously conducted study at our institute [18]. To ensure the protection of personal information of the subjects included in this study, participants' names were anonymized, and participant identification codes and medical record numbers were encrypted. Access to the data of the study participants was conducted for one year, from June 2015 to May 2016.” Additionally, in accordance with the PLOS ONE checklist, we have conducted the necessary verifications and submitted the original IRB approval document along with its English translation as other materials.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.