RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 COVID-19 self-testing: Countries accelerating policies ahead of WHO guidelines during pandemics: A Global Survey
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.08.23.23294474
DO 10.1101/2023.08.23.23294474
A1 Sakala, Melody
A1 Johnson, Cheryl
A1 Chirombo, James
A1 Sacks, Jilian A.
A1 Baggaley, Rachel
A1 Divala, Titus
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/24/2023.08.23.23294474.abstract
AB Introduction The widespread use of antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) has revolutionized SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) testing, particularly through the option of self-testing. The full extent of Ag-RDT utilization for self-testing, however, remains largely unexplored. To inform the development of WHO guidance on COVID-19 self-testing, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to gather the views and experiences of policy makers, researchers, and implementers worldwide.Methods The survey was shared through professional networks via email and social media, encouraging onward sharing. We used closed and open-ended questions related to policy and program information concerning the regulation, availability, target population, indications, implementation, benefits, and challenges of COVID-19 self-testing (C19ST). We defined self-testing as tests performed and interpreted by an untrained individual, often at home. Descriptive summaries, cross-tabulations, and proportions were used to calculate outcomes at the global level and by WHO region and World Bank income classifications.Results Between 01 and 11 February 2022, 844 individuals from 139 countries responded to the survey, with 45% reporting affiliation with governments and 47% operating at the national level. 504 respondents from 101 countries reported policies supporting C19ST for a range of use cases, including symptomatic and asymptomatic populations. More respondents from low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) than high-income countries (HICs) reported a lack of an C19ST policy (61 vs 11 countries) and low population-level reach of C19ST. Respondents with C19ST experience perceived that the tests were mostly acceptable to target populations, provided significant benefits, and highlighted several key challenges to be addressed for increased success. Reported costs varied widely, ranging from specific programmes enabling free access to certain users and others with high costs via the private sector.Conclusion Based on the survey responses, systems for the regulatory review, policy development and implementation of C19STappeared to be much more common in HIC when compared to LIC in early 2022, though most respondents indicated self-testing was available to some extent (101 out of 139 countries) in their country. Addressing such global inequities is critical for ensuring access to innovative and impactful interventions in the context of a public health emergency of international concern. The challenges and opportunities highlighted by survey respondents could be valuable to consider as future testing strategies are being set for outbreak-prone diseases.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by UNITAD and the funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was conducted with a strong commitment to ethical considerations. The survey, disseminated globally via online platforms, ensured voluntary participation. While no explicit informed consent was obtained, the purpose of the survey was clear to all participants. Some identifiable data was collected however, participants' anonymity was strictly maintained during data management analysis and reporting and no individual identities will be disclosed or compromised.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData is available on DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.23993484 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.23993484