PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Alarid-Escudero, Fernando
AU  - Andrews, Jason
AU  - Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D.
TI  - Effects of Mitigation and Control Policies in Realistic Epidemic Models Accounting for Household Transmission Dynamics
AID  - 10.1101/2023.01.26.23285075
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.01.26.23285075
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/24/2023.01.26.23285075.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/24/2023.01.26.23285075.full
AB  - Background Compartmental infectious disease (ID) models are often used to evaluate non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and vaccines. Such models rarely separate within-household and community transmission, potentially introducing biases in situations where multiple transmission routes exist. We formulated an approach that incorporates household structure into ID models, extending the work of House and Keeling.Design We developed a multi-compartment susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered-susceptible-vaccinated (MC-SEIRSV) modeling framework, allowing non-exponentially distributed duration in Exposed and Infectious compartments, that tracks within-household and community transmission. We simulated epidemics that varied by community and household transmission rates, waning immunity rate, household size (3 or 5 members), and numbers of Exposed and Infectious compartments (1-3 each). We calibrated otherwise identical models without household structure to the early phase of each parameter combination’s epidemic curve. We compared each model pair in terms of epidemic forecasts and predicted NPI and vaccine impacts on: the timing and magnitude of the epidemic peak and on its total size. Meta-analytic regressions characterized the relationship between household structure inclusion and the size and direction of biases.Results Otherwise similar models with and without household structure produced equivalent early epidemic curves. However, forecasts from models without household structure were biased. Without intervention, they were upward-biased on peak size and total epidemic size, with biases also depending on the number of Exposed and Infectious compartments. Model-estimated NPI effects of a 60% reduction in community contacts on peak time and size were systematically overestimated without household structure. Biases were smaller with a 20% reduction NPI. Because vaccination impacted both community and household transmission, their biases were smaller.Conclusions ID models without household structure can produce biased outcomes in settings where within-household and community transmission differ.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFinancial support for this study was provided in parts by a grant from the Society for Medical Decision Making (SMDM) funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, a grant from Open Society Foundations (OSF), and a gift from the Wadhwani Institute for Artificial Intelligence Foundation, and Advanced Micro Devices (Santa Clara, CA, USA) provided a donation of servers. The funding agreement ensured the authors' independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors https://github.com/SC-COSMO/hhmcseirv