RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Investigating the clinico-anatomical dissociation in the behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 19006676
DO 10.1101/19006676
A1 Singleton, Ellen H.
A1 Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L.
A1 Sudre, Carole H.
A1 Groot, Colin
A1 Kochova, Elena
A1 Barkhof, Frederik
A1 Joie, Renaud La
A1 Rosen, Howard J.
A1 Seeley, William W.
A1 Miller, Bruce
A1 Cardoso, M. Jorge
A1 Papma, Janne
A1 Scheltens, Philip
A1 Rabinovici, Gil D.
A1 Ossenkoppele, Rik
YR 2019
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/09/20/19006676.abstract
AB Objective We previously found temporoparietal “Alzheimer-typical” atrophy in patients with the behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease (bvAD) with relative sparing of frontal regions. Here, we aimed to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of bvAD based on alternative neuroimaging markers.Methods We retrospectively included 150 participants at the University of California San Francisco and University of Berkeley, including 29 bvAD, 28 “typical” amnestic-predominant AD (tAD), 28 behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), and 65 cognitively normal participants. Patients with bvAD were compared with other groups on glucose metabolism and metabolic connectivity on [18F]FDG-PET, and subcortical gray matter volumes and white matter hyperintensity volumes (WMHV) on MRI. A receiver-operating-characteristic-analysis was performed to determine the measures yielding the highest contrast between groups.Results bvAD and tAD showed predominant temporoparietal hypometabolism compared to controls, and did not differ in direct contrasts. However, overlaying statistical maps from contrasts between patients and controls revealed broader frontoinsular hypometabolism in bvAD compared to tAD, partially overlapping with bvFTD. Metabolic connectivity analyses indicated greater anterior default mode network (DMN) involvement in bvAD compared to tAD, mimicking bvFTD. Analyses of subcortical volume and WMHV showed no relevant group differences. The top-3 discriminative measures for bvAD vs. bvFTD were: metabolism in posterior (bvAD<bvFTD), anterior DMN (bvAD>bvFTD) and parietal cortex (bvAD<bvFTD; AUC: 0.80-0.91, p<0.01), while the top-3 discriminators for bvAD vs. tAD were amygdalar volume (bvAD>tAD), anterior DMN (bvAD<tAD) and salience network metabolism (bvAD<tAD; AUC: 0.66-0.75, p<0.05).Conclusion Subtle frontoinsular hypometabolism and anterior DMN involvement may underlie the prominent behavioral phenotype in bvAD.Competing Interest StatementGil D. Rabinovici reports research support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, GE Healthcare, Eli Lilly, Life Molecular Imaging; Scientific advisory boards for Axon Neurosciences, Eiasi, Merck, Roche; Associate Editor for JAMA Neurology. Frederik Barkhof reports research support from GE Healthcare, Biogen, Novartis and TEVA; Scientific advisory boards for Roche, Biogen, Merck, Roche. Lundbeck and IXICO. Philip Scheltens serves/has served on the advisory boards of: Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Danone, Nutricia, Jansen AI, Baxter, and Lundbeck. He has been a speaker at symposia organized by Lundbeck, Lilly, Merz, Pfizer, Jansen AI, Danone, Novartis, Roche, and Genentech. He serves on the editorial board of Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy and Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders and is a member of the scientific advisory board of the EU Joint Programming Initiative and the French National Plan Alzheimer. The Alzheimer Center receives unrestricted funding from various sources through the VUmc Fonds. Dr. Scheltens receives no personal compensation for the activities mentioned above.Funding StatementWork at the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, ZonMw (70-73305-98-1214 to Rik Ossenkoppele, PI). Research of the Alzheimer center Amsterdam is part of the neurodegeneration research program of Amsterdam Neuroscience. The Alzheimer Center Amsterdam is supported by Stichting Alzheimer Nederland and Stichting VUmc fonds. Work at the University of California San Francisco was supported by the NIH National Institute on Aging (NIA) grants R01-AG045611 (to G.D.R.).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAnonymized data used in the present study may be available upon request to the corresponding author.