PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Yedavalli, Vivek AU - Heit, Jeremy J AU - Dehkharghani, Seena AU - Haerian, Hafez AU - Mcmenamy, John M. AU - Honce, Justin AU - Timpone, Vincent M AU - Harnain, Christopher AU - Kesselman, Andrew AU - Filly, Anthony AU - Beardsley, Adam AU - Sakamoto, Brian AU - Song, Christopher AU - Montuori, James L AU - Navot, Benjamin AU - Mena, Francisco Villar AU - Giurgiutiu, Dan-Victor AU - Kitamura, Felipe AU - Lima, Fabricio Oliveira AU - Silva, Henrique Coelho AU - Mont’Alverne, Francisco José Arruda AU - Albers, Gregory W TI - Performance of RAPID noncontrast CT stroke platform in large vessel occlusion and intracranial hemorrhage detection AID - 10.1101/2023.08.11.23294007 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.08.11.23294007 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/16/2023.08.11.23294007.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/16/2023.08.11.23294007.full AB - Background Noncontrast CT (NCCT) is used to evaluate for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and ischemia in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Large vessel occlusions (LVOs) are a major cause of AIS, but challenging to detect on NCCT.Aims The purpose of this study is to evaluate an AI software called RAPID NCCT Stroke (RAPID, iSchemaView, Menlo Park, CA) for ICH and LVO detection compared to expert readers.Methods In this IRB approved retrospective, multicenter study, stand-alone performance of the software was assessed based on the consensus of 3 neuroradiologists and sensitivity and specificity were determined. The platform’s performance was then compared to interpretation by readers comprised of eight general radiologists (GR) and three neuroradiologists (NR) in detecting ICH and hyperdense vessel sign (HVS) indicating LVO. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of each reader. P < 0.05 was considered significant.Results A total of 244 cases were included. Of the 244, 115 were LVOs and 26 were ICHs. One hundred three cases did not have LVO nor ICH. Stand-alone performance of the software demonstrated sensitivities and specificities of 96.2% and 99.5% for ICH and 63.5% and 95.1% for LVO detection.Compared to all 11 readers and eight GR readers only respectively, the software demonstrated superiority, achieving significantly higher sensitivities (63.5% versus 43.6%, p < 0.0001 and 63.5% versus 40.9%, p =0.001).Conclusion The RAPID NCCT Stroke platform demonstrates superior performance to radiologists for detecting LVO from a NCCT. Use of this software platform could lead to earlier LVO detection and expedited transfer of these patients to a thrombectomy capable center.Competing Interest StatementDrs. Jeremy Heit and Vivek Yedavalli disclose roles as consultants for RAPID (iSchemaView, Menlo Park, CA). Dr. Greg Albers is the co-founder of RAPID.Funding StatementNo funding source for this investigation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This retrospective, multicenter study was conducted in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and was approved by the institutional review boards (IRB; Advarra central IRB Pro00049230).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData can be made available upon reasonable request.