RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Association between the ACE I/D gene polymorphism and progressive renal failure in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: A meta-analysis JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 19002949 DO 10.1101/19002949 A1 Pabalan, Noel A1 Tharabenjasin, Phuntila A1 Parcharoen, Yardnapar A1 Tasanarong, Adis YR 2019 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/08/09/19002949.abstract AB Objective The angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion (ACE I/D) gene polymorphism is involved in a wide range of clinical outcomes. This makes ACE I/D an important genetic marker. Updating the genetic profile of ACE I/D and raising the evidence for its role in renal disease is therefore needed. Reported associations of ACE I/D with progressive renal failure (PRF) in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) have been inconsistent, prompting a meta-analysis to obtain more precise estimates.Methods Multi-database search yielded 18 articles for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Risks (odds ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals) were estimated by comparing the ACE genotypes (heterozygote ID, homozygotes DD and II). Heterogeneous (random-effects) pooled associations were subjected to outlier treatment which yielded fixed-effects outcomes and split the findings into pre- (PRO) and post- (PSO) outlier status. Subgroup analysis was based on ethnicity (Asian/Caucasian) and minor allele frequency (maf). The ≥ 0.50 maf subgroup indicates higher frequency of the variant II genotype over that of the common DD genotype, otherwise, the subgroup is considered < 0.50 maf. Stability of the associative effects was assessed with sensitivity treatment. Temporal trend of association was examined with cumulative meta-analysis.Results In the PSO analysis, overall effects were null (ORs 0.99-1.02) but not in the subgroups (Asian and ≥ 0.50 maf), where in presence of the D allele (DD/ID) and the I allele (II), increased (ORs 1.63-5.62) and reduced (OR 0.22) risks were observed, respectively. Of these pooled effects, the Asian and ≥ 0.50 maf homozygous DD genotypes had high ORs (5.01-5.63) indicating elevated magnitude of effects that were highly significant (Pa < 10−5) and homogeneous (I2 = 0%), in addition to their robustness. In contrast, the Caucasian and < 0.50 maf subgroup effects were: (i) non-heterogeneous (fixed-effects) at the outset, which did not require outlier treatment and (ii) non-significant (ORs 0.91-1.10, Pa = 0.15-0.79). Cumulative meta-analysis revealed increased precision of effects over time.Conclusions PRF in ADPKD impacted the Asian and ≥ 0.50 maf subgroups where DD homozygote carriers were up to 6-fold susceptible. The high magnitude of these effects were highly significant, homogeneous and robust indicating strong evidence of association.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectorsAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.Not ApplicableAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information filesABPAustralia Bulgaria PolandACEangiotensin converting enzyme geneACEangiotensin converting enzyme proteinADPKDautosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseaseAManalysis modelBFBayes FactorBFRBelgium FranceCBClark-BaudouinCCcase-controlCIconfidence intervalCOcohortCScross-sectionalDdecreased riskDDvariant homozygous genotypeDNAdeoxyribonucleic acidEHeliminated heterogeneityESelevated significanceFfixed-effectsGSgained significanceHWEHardy-Weinberg EquilibriumIincreased riskI2measure of variabilityI/DpolymorphismIDheterozygous genotypeIIcommon homozygous genotypeLSlost significancemafminor allele frequencymRNAmessenger ribonucleic acidNtotal number of comparisonsnnumber of studiesnfrequency of occurrenceORodds ratioPaP-value for associationPbP-value for heterogeneityPRFprogressive renal failurePRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesPROpre-outlierPSOpost-outlierRrandom-effects[R]Reference of studiesRNSretained non-significanceRHreduced heterogeneityUKAUnited Kingdom AustraliaUSAUnited States of America