PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Cacciamani, Giovanni E. AU - Sholklapper, Tamir AU - Eppler, Michael B. AU - Sayegh, Aref AU - Stornino Ramacciotti, Lorenzo AU - Abreu, Andre L. AU - Sotelo, Rene AU - Desai, Mihir M. AU - Gill, Inderbir S. AU - ICARUS Global Surgical Collaboration TI - Study Protocol for the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Cross-Specialty Surveys Among Surgeons, Anesthesiologists, Nurses, Interventional Cardiologists, and Interventional Radiologists AID - 10.1101/2023.08.08.23293789 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.08.08.23293789 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/10/2023.08.08.23293789.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/10/2023.08.08.23293789.full AB - Every year, approximately 200 million surgeries are performed worldwide, and intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) have a significant impact on patients and surgeons. Despite their importance, the true scale of iAEs remains underestimated due to inadequate methods for assessment, collection, grading, and reporting. Various grading systems have been introduced over the past decade, but their adoption has been limited, leading to inconsistencies in reporting. Furthermore, a lack of standardized frameworks for defining, assessing, and collecting iAEs, coupled with litigation concerns, contributes to underreporting. Only half of surgery and anesthesiology journals provide guidance on reporting perioperative adverse events, and recommendations for reporting iAEs are notably lacking in surgical literature. To address these issues, the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standard (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration was established in 2022. The initiative involves conducting global surveys and a Delphi consensus to understand the barriers for poor reporting of iAEs, validate shared criteria for reporting, define iAEs according to surgical procedures, evaluate the existing grading systems’ reliability, and identify strategies for enhancing the collection, reporting, and management of iAEs. A sample size of 2,398 respondents was calculated for the study, with invitations extended to 86,574 healthcare providers. This effort represents an essential step towards improved patient safety and the well-being of healthcare professionals in the surgical field.Competing Interest StatementMihir M. Desai is a proctor for PROCEPT BioRobotics. Inderbir S. Gill is an unpaid advisor for Steba and has equity interest in OneLine Health. Andre Luis Abreu is a consultant for Koelis and Quibim, and speaker for EDAP. Other authors do not have any competing interests. Clinical TrialNCT04994392 and NCT05270603Clinical Protocols https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NDQ4F Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This Institutional Review Board of University of Southern California gave ethical approval for this work (UP-21-00473 and UP-21-01010). This study is registered to ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04994392 and NCT05270603). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors