RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Crossover of the dimensions of work-family and family-work conflict in couples: Protocol for a qualitative study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.08.06.23293724
DO 10.1101/2023.08.06.23293724
A1 Smoktunowicz, Ewelina
A1 Lesnierowska, Magdalena
A1 Ziolkowska, Justyna
A1 Roczniewska, Marta
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/09/2023.08.06.23293724.abstract
AB Conflict between work and non-work is a bidirectional and a multidimensional construct that has garnered much attention from researchers and practitioners alike. Previously, studies with a dyadic design demonstrated that interrole conflict can cross over between partners in romantic relationships. The aim of the present study is to explore—from an individual and dyadic perspective—how partners perceive dimensions of interrole conflict (that is: time, strain, behaviour, and possibly others) and whether crossover between partners is dimension-dependent. This protocol outlines a qualitative interview study. Participants (N = 40) will be dual-earner couples that meet two inclusion criteria: both partners need to be professionally active, and the couples need to have lived together for at least a year. Interviews will be conducted separately with each partner. To analyse the data at the individual level we will use reflexive thematic analysis. To analyse the data at the dyadic level we will apply an adapted version of the framework method. We anticipate that findings of this study will have the potential to advance theoretical models depicting crossover processes and, more generally, the interface between work and family lives. Moreover, insights into how couples experience dimension-based interrole conflict will be important for the development of targeted interventions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared that no competing interests exist.Funding StatementThis research was funded in whole by National Science Centre, Poland (grant number 2020/39/D/HS6/02131 awarded to ES). The funder did not and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The protocol for this study was approved by the departmental Ethical Review Board at SWPS University (decision number 32/2023 issued on July 11th, 2023). Participants will sign an informed consent form that has been reviewed and approved by the aforementioned review board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesNo datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion. https://l1nq.com/tLY3E