RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Predicting Clinical Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection During the Omicron Wave Using Machine Learning
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.08.06.23293725
DO 10.1101/2023.08.06.23293725
A1 Cogill, Steven
A1 Nallamshetty, Shriram
A1 Fullenkamp, Natalie
A1 Heberer, Kent
A1 Lynch, Julie
A1 Lee, Kyung Min
A1 Aslan, Mihaela
A1 Shih, Mei-Chiung
A1 Lee, Jennifer S
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/09/2023.08.06.23293725.abstract
AB The Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant continues to strain healthcare systems. Developing tools that facilitate the identification of patients at highest risk of adverse outcomes is a priority. The study objectives are to develop population-scale predictive models that: 1) identify predictors of adverse outcomes with Omicron surge SARS-CoV-2 infections, and 2) predict the impact of prioritized vaccination of high-risk groups for said outcome. We prepared a retrospective longitudinal observational study of a national cohort of 192,984 patients in the U.S. Veteran Health Administration who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from January 15 to August 15, 2022. We utilized sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, vaccination status, and prior COVID-19 infections, at time of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 to predict hospitalization, escalation of care (high-flow oxygen, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, dialysis, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), and death within 30 days. Machine learning models demonstrated that advanced age, high comorbidity burden, lower body mass index, unvaccinated status, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and oral anticoagulant use were the important predictors of hospitalization and escalation of care. Similar factors predicted death. However, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with lower 30-day mortality, and anticoagulant use did not predict mortality risk. The all-cause death model showed the highest discrimination (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.895, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.885, 0.906) followed by hospitalization (AUC = 0.829, CI: 0.825, 0.834), then escalation of care (AUC=0.805, CI: 0.795, 0.814). Assuming a vaccine efficacy range of 70.8 to 78.7%, our simulations projected that targeted prevention in the highest risk group may have reduced 30-day hospitalization, care escalation, and death in more than 2 of 5 unvaccinated patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCSP#2012, Veterans Affairs All AuthorsAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Patient clinical data were analyzed at VA Palo Alto as part of the VHA research data initiative, Leveraging Electronic Health Information to Advance Precision Medicine (LEAP, CSP#2012) research protocol, which has been approved by Institutional Review Boards and research committees at 3 VA Medical Centers (Salt Lake City, Palo Alto, and West Haven).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData cannot be shared publicly because it is restricted to VHA employees/users. Data are from the Corporate Data Warehouse that is part of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Information & Technology.