PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Rodrigues, Isabel B.
AU  - Swance, Rachel
AU  - Tariq, Suleman
AU  - Kouroukis, Alexa
AU  - Adachi, Jonathan
AU  - Bray, Steven
AU  - Rabinovich, Alexander
AU  - Ioannidis, George
AU  - Zheng, Rong
AU  - Kobsar, Dylan
AU  - Fang, Qiyin
AU  - Papaioannou, Alexandra
TI  - Mapping the context of sedentary behaviour (MAPS-B) using wearable sensors, indoor positioning systems, and diaries in older adults who are pre-frail and frail: A feasibility longitudinal study
AID  - 10.1101/2023.08.04.23293656
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.08.04.23293656
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/08/2023.08.04.23293656.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/08/2023.08.04.23293656.full
AB  - Older adults who are frail are likely to be sedentary. Prior interventions to reduce sedentary time in older adults have not been successful as there is little research about the context of sedentary behaviour (posture, location, purpose, social environment). Moreover, there is limited evidence on feasible measures to assess context of sedentary behaviour in older adults. The aim of our study was to determine the feasibility of measuring context of sedentary behaviour in older adults with pre-frailty or frailty using a combination of objective and self-report measures. We defined “feasibility process” using recruitment (20 participants within two-months), retention (85%), and refusal (20%) rates and “feasibility resource” if the measures capture context and can be linked (e.g., sitting-kitchen-eating-alone) and are all participants willing to use the measures. Context was assessed using a wearable sensor to assess posture, a smart home monitoring system for location, and an electronic or hard-copy diary for purpose and social context over three days in winter and spring. We approached 80 potential individuals, and 58 expressed interest; of the 58 individuals, 37 did not enroll due to lack of interest or medical mistrust (64% refusal). We recruited 21 older adults (72±7.3 years, 13 females, 13 frail) within two months and experienced two dropouts due to medical mistrust or worsening health (90% retention). The wearable sensor, indoor positioning system, and electronic diary accurately captured one domain of context, but the hard copy was often not completed with enough detail, so it was challenging to link it to the other devices. Although not all participants were willing to use the wearable sensor, indoor positioning system, or electronic diary, we were able to triage the measures of those who did. Future studies will need to determine the most feasible and valid method to assess the context of sedentary behaviour, especially in diverse older adults.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementIBR received the New Investigator Fund from the Hamilton Health Science (NIF-22541) to support the MAPS-B project. IBR also received funding from the 2022 MIRA-AGE-WELL Award and the 2022 CIHR Fellowship Award. The funders did not play any role in the study design, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval was obtained from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData is publicly available upon request for research purposes only.