RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The global scientific research response to the public health emergency of Zika virus infection
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 19001313
DO 10.1101/19001313
A1 de Oliveira, Juliane Fonseca
A1 Pescarini, Julia Moreira
A1 de Souza Rodrigues, Moreno
A1 de Araujo Almeida, Bethania
A1 Henriques, Claudio Maierovitch Pessanha
A1 Gouveia, Fabio Castro
A1 Rabello, Elaine Teixeira
A1 Matta, Gustavo Correa
A1 Barreto, Mauricio L.
A1 Sampaio, Ricardo Barros
YR 2019
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/07/16/19001313.abstract
AB Background Science studies have been a field of research for different knowledge areas and they have been successfully used to analyse the construction of scientific knowledge, practice and dissemination. In this study, we aimed to verify how the Zika epidemic has moulded scientific production worldwide analysing international collaboration and the knowledge landscape through time, research topics and country involvement.Methodology We searched the Web of Science (WoS) for studies published up to 31st December 2018 on Zika using the search terms “zika”, “zkv” or “zikv”. We analysed the scientific production regarding which countries have published the most, on which topics, as well as country level collaboration. We performed a scientometric analysis of research on Zika focusing on knowledge mapping and the scientific research path over time and space.Findings We found two well defined research areas divided into three subtopics accounting for six clusters. With regard to country analysis, the USA followed by Brazil were the leading countries in publications on Zika. China entered as a new player focusing on specific research areas. When we took into consideration the epidemics and reported cases, Brazil and France were the leading research countries on related topics. As for international collaboration, the USA followed by England and France stand out as the main hubs. The research areas most published included public health related topics from 2015 until the very beginning of 2016, followed by an increase in topics related to the clinical aspects of the disease in 2016 and the beginnings of laboratorial research in 2017/2018.Conclusions Mapping the response to Zika, a public health emergency, demonstrated a clear pattern of the participation of countries in the scientific advances. The pattern of knowledge production found in this study represented the different perspectives and interests of countries based firstly on their level of exposure to the epidemic and secondly on their financial positions with regard to science.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is supported by the Center of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS) through the Zika Platform- a long-term surveillance platform for the Zika virus and microcephaly, Unified Health System (SUS) - Brazilian Ministry of Health. This work was partially supported by the European Union?s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under ZIKAlliance Grant Agreement no.734548, and by the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation/ Vice-Presidency of Research and Biological Collections-Fiocruz/ VPPCB and the Newton Fund/British Council.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.Not ApplicableAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.