RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 An example of too much too soon? A retrospective review of Caesarean Sections performed in the first stage of labour in Kenya
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.07.30.23293379
DO 10.1101/2023.07.30.23293379
A1 Allott, Helen
A1 Dickinson, Fiona
A1 Karangau, Stephen
A1 Oduor, Michael
A1 Shaaban, Nassir
A1 Ogoti, Evans
A1 Sawe, Sheila
A1 Ochola, Ephraim
A1 Ameh, Charles
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/05/2023.07.30.23293379.abstract
AB Objective In Kenya, decisions to perform CS are frequently made by unsupported non-specialist doctors, sometimes resulting in sub-optimal decision-making and inappropriate surgery. This study assesses decision-making in CS performed in the first stage of labour by a retrospective case review.Methods A panel of expert obstetricians reviewed case-notes randomly selected from a series obtained from seven Kenyan referral hospitals, then discussed in pairs and as a group where opinions differed.Results Of the 87 case-notes reviewed consensus was achieved in 94.3% cases. In 41.3% cases, CS was considered appropriate by all assessors, including 8.9% cases where the CS was necessary but performed too late. The decision to delivery interval was 2 hours or longer in 65.8% cases, including 18 cases done for non-reassuring fetal status. In 10.3% it was considered that further reassessment should have occurred.In 9.2% the reviewers concluded that the CS was done too soon and alternative measures could have been taken. Insufficient information was available in the records to make a full assessment in 21.8% of cases and in 11.5% the CS was considered to be inappropriate.Conclusions This review suggests a need for improved support for decision-making, improved record-keeping and more timely surgery when indicated.Synopsis At least 11.5% of Caesarean Sections in the first stage of labour could be avoided if decision-makers had access to support from more experienced practitioners.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was partly funded under a grant from the UK FCDO (Reducing Maternal & Neonatal Death in Kenya, number 202549) (Charles Ameh), and partly from an award from LSTM (Fiona Dickinson). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was sought prospectively and obtained from the LSTM Research Ethics Committee (ref: 21-041) and the Moi University Institutional Research Ethics Committee (ref: IREC/2021/115). Personal identifiable information concerning staff and patients was electronically redacted to preserve confidentiality and reduce the possibility of any reviewer bias.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors