PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Liang, Caihua
AU  - Kelly, Scott P.
AU  - Shen, Rongjun
AU  - Li, Ling
AU  - Lobello, Kasia
AU  - Arkin, Steven
AU  - Huang, Kui
AU  - Zhou, Xiaofeng
TI  - Predicting Wilson’s Disease Progression using Machine Learning with Real-World Electronic Health Records
AID  - 10.1101/2023.07.28.23293309
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.07.28.23293309
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/04/2023.07.28.23293309.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/04/2023.07.28.23293309.full
AB  - BACKGROUND & AIMS Wilson’s disease (WD) is a rare genetic disorder causing excessive copper accumulation. Research on the natural history of WD is limited. Our objective was to identify predictors for WD progression to cirrhosis, liver failure, and death and to predict individual risk of progression to these endpoints at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after WD diagnosis.METHODS A retrospective natural history cohort study of adult patients with first-recorded WD diagnosis was conducted using the US Optum EHR data between 1/1/2007 and 6/30/2020. LASSO Cox regression, Random Survival Forest (RSF), and XGBoost (XGB) models were used to identify important predictors for progression to cirrhosis, liver failure, and death. The strong predictors for each outcome identified through weighted average rankings across models and reviewed by clinical experts were used for patient-level prediction using RSF and XGB models. The resulting models were validated with an independent sample cohort. C-index and dynamic AUCs were used to evaluate model performance.RESULTS Over the study period, 310 out of 2,901 WD patients developed cirrhosis, 255 out of 3,251 developed liver failure, and 604 out of 3,559 died. Age at WD diagnosis, alcoholism, AST and bilirubin levels within 3 months of WD diagnosis, and neurologic and hepatic conditions were the most common predictors for progression to the study endpoints. XGB had a slight superior predictive performance compared with RSF and was then used to predict individual risks for progression to the study endpoints with the top ensemble predictors. The dynamic AUC was 0.78 at Year 1, 0.74 at Year 2, 0.72 at Year 3 and 0.72 at Year 5 for cirrhosis; 0.82 at Year 1, 0.78 at Year 2, and 0.77 at both Year 3 and Year 5 for liver failure; 0.81 at Year 1, 0.83 at Year 2, and 0.82 at both Year 3 and Year 5 for death.CONCLUSIONS This study identified the most influential clinical predictors and assessed patient-level risk of WD progression using machine learning. Results from machine learning prognostic models will increase understanding of disease natural history and may help improve clinical trial design and guide individualized clinical care.Competing Interest StatementLiang, Kelly, Shen, Li, Lobello, Arkin, Huang, Zhou were Pfizer employees at the time of this manuscript preparation and are shareholders in Pfizer.Funding StatementThis study was sponsored by PfizerAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not Applicable