PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Gauthier, Lucas W.
AU  - Willems, Marjolaine
AU  - Chatron, Nicolas
AU  - Cenni, Camille
AU  - Meyer, Pierre
AU  - Ruault, Valentin
AU  - Wells, Constance
AU  - Sabbagh, Quentin
AU  - Genevieve, David
AU  - Yauy, Kevin
TI  - Assessing feasibility and risk to translate, de-identify and summarize medical letters using deep learning
AID  - 10.1101/2023.07.27.23293234
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.07.27.23293234
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/31/2023.07.27.23293234.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/31/2023.07.27.23293234.full
AB  - Background Precision medicine requires accurate phenotyping and data sharing, particularly for rare diseases. However, sharing medical letters across language barriers is challenging, as inconsistent and incomplete Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms provided by physicians can lead to a loss of clinical information.Methods To assess the feasibility and the risk of using deep learning methods to translate, de-identify and summarize medical letters, we developed an open-source deep learning multi-language software in line with health data privacy. We conducted a non-inferiority clinical trial using deep learning methods versus a physician to de-identify protected health information (PHI) targeting a minimum sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 75%, and summarize non-English medical letters in HPO format, aiming a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 90%.Results From March to April 2023, we evaluated 50 non-English medical letters from 8 physicians coming from 12 different indications of which neurodevelopmental disorders, congenital disorders, fetal pathology and oncology. Letter contains in median 15 PHI and 7 HPO terms. Deep learning method achieved a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 87% in de-identification, and a specificity of 92% in summarizing medical letters, reporting a median number of 6,6 HPO terms per letter, which is equivalent to the number of HPO terms provided usually by physicians in databases (6,8 in PhenoDB).Conclusions De-identification and summarization of non-English medical letters using deep learning methods, compared with the current manual physician’s method reports non-inferior performance, providing insights on AI usage to facilitate precision medicine.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nNNZisBGYWE8XvJFNLgGmdsl3783oqBREE0V_uvGfK8/edit?usp=sharing Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of University Hospital Center of Montpellier gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors