RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The effectiveness of digital technology interventions to reduce loneliness in adult people: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 19000414
DO 10.1101/19000414
A1 Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar
A1 Nogueras, David
A1 van Woerden, Hugo Cornelis
A1 Kiparoglou, Vasiliki
YR 2019
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/07/03/19000414.abstract
AB Introduction Loneliness is an emerging public health problem, which is associated with social, emotional, mental and physical health issues. The application of digital technology (DT) interventions to reduce loneliness has increased in recent years. The effectiveness of DT interventions needs to be assessed systematically.Aim To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of digital technology interventions to reduce loneliness among adult people.Design systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Five leading online bibliographic databases: PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science.Publication period 1 January 2010 to 30 April 2019.Inclusion criteria Primary studies involving the application of digital technology interventions to reduce loneliness, involving adult participants (aged 18 years and more) and published in the English language.Search strategy Literature searches using a priory list of keywords, involvement of two independent researchers in article screening, short listing and data extraction using a predefined template based on the population, intervention(s), comparator(s) and outcome(s) (PICO) framework.Synthesis and meta-analysis A narrative summary of the characteristics of included studies, findings by the type of DT intervention, and the age, gender and ethnicity of participants. A meta-analysis by the type of DT intervention and determination of effect sizes.Quality of evidence and bias Quality of evidence assessed the RoB 2.0 (revised tool for Risk of Bias in randomized trials) and ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions) tools for randomized control trials and non-randomized studies respectively. Heterogeneity between studies determined by the I2 and Cochran’s Q statistics and publication bias checked with funnel plots and the Egger’s test.Patients and public involvement NoneEthics and dissemination Ethics approval was not required for writing this protocol. The findings will be disseminated through the publication of research articles and conference presentations.PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42019131524.Strengths and limitations of this studyThe main strength of this study includes a systematic assessment of evidence on the effectiveness of digital technology interventions to reduce loneliness, which is imperative from the health and social care and public health perspectives.Another strength of the study is the involvement of two independent researchers (and a third researcher as an arbitrator) involved in the identification, screening, inclusion and extraction of on a predefined template using the PICO framework.Limitations may include missing identification of additional relevant studies due to the application of selection filters such as the publication years and English as the publication language.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocolshttp://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019131524Funding StatementThis research was funded/supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.NAAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.NAAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.NAI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.NANot applicable because this is a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.