PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Engels, Lindsy M.J.
AU  - Barten, Dennis G.
AU  - Boumans, Thimo J.T.
AU  - Gaakeer, Menno I.
AU  - Latten, Gideon H.P.
AU  - Mehagnoul, Jannet
AU  - Tapirdamaz, Özlem
AU  - van Osch, Frits
AU  - Mortelmans, Luc
TI  - Fight or Flight: Emergency Healthcare Workers’ Willingness to Work during Crises and Disasters: A cross-sectional multicentre study in the Netherlands
AID  - 10.1101/2023.07.25.23293139
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.07.25.23293139
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/27/2023.07.25.23293139.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/27/2023.07.25.23293139.full
AB  - Objective Expanding staff levels is a strategy for hospitals to increase surge capacity. This study aimed to evaluate whether emergency healthcare workers (HCWs) are willing to work (WTW) during a crises or disaster and which working conditions would influence their decision.Methods HCWs of emergency departments (ED) and intensive care units (ICU) of five Dutch hospitals were surveyed about elevens disaster scenarios. For each scenario, HCWs were asked about their WTW and which conditions would influence their decision. Knowledge and perceived risk and danger was assessed per scenario.Results 306/630 HCWs completed the survey. An influenza epidemic, SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and natural disaster were associated with highest WTW rates (69.0%, 63.7% and 53.3% respectively). WTW was lowest in nuclear incident (4.6%) and dirty bomb (3.3%) scenarios. WTW was higher in physicians than in nurses. Male ED HCWS, single HCWs and childless HCWs were more often WTW. Personal protective equipment (PPE) and safety of HCWs’ family were the most important working conditions. Perceived knowledge scored lowest in dirty bomb, biological and nuclear incident scenarios. These scenarios rated highest with regards to perceived danger.Conclusions WTW depended on disaster type, profession and working department. Provision of PPE and safety of HCWs’ family were found to be predominant working conditions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB Maastricht University Medical Centre waived ethical approval for this work (study ID 2022-3417).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsCBRNchemical, biological, radiographic, nuclearCREECCentre for Research and Education in Emergency CareEDemergency departmentHCWhealthcare workersHFhaemorrhagic feverICNInternational Council of NursingICUintensive care departmentIQRinterquartile rangeMCImass casualty incidentPPEpersonal protective equipmentSDstandard deviationSPSSStatistical Package for the Social SciencesWTWwillingness to work