RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Methodological approach to sleep state misperception in insomnia disorder: comparison between multiple nights of actigraphy recordings and a single night of polysomnography recording
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.07.25.23293105
DO 10.1101/2023.07.25.23293105
A1 Maltezos, Antonia
A1 Perrault, Aurore A.
A1 Walsh, Nyissa A.
A1 Phillips, Emma-Maria
A1 Gong, Kirsten
A1 Tarelli, Lukia
A1 Smith, Dylan
A1 Cross, Nathan E.
A1 Pomares, Florence B.
A1 Gouin, Jean-Philippe
A1 Dang-Vu, Thien Thanh
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/27/2023.07.25.23293105.abstract
AB Rationale Sleep state misperception (SSM) represents the discrepancy between objectively recorded and subjectively perceived measures of sleep, including sleep onset latency (SOL), sleep duration (TST) and wake duration (WASO). The severity of SSM is higher in insomnia disorder (INS) compared to other populations. SSM is typically assessed in-lab during one night with polysomnographic (PSG) recording or at-home with actigraphy recordings over multiple days, both complemented by subjective sleep reports. Both methods of data collection have their specific strengths and weaknesses, and provide sleep measures that may differ, especially in individuals with sleep disorders. The extent to which the methods and environment of data collection impact measures of sleep misperception remains unclear. This study aimed at providing a comprehensive assessment of SSM in INS and good sleepers (GS) by comparing recordings performed for one night in-lab (PSG and night review) and during several nights at-home (actigraphy and sleep diaries).Methods Fifty-seven INS and 29 GS wore an actigraphy device and filled a sleep diary for two weeks at-home. They subsequently completed a PSG recording and filled a night review the next morning in-lab. Sleep perception index (subjective/objective × 100; in %) of SOL, WASO and TST were computed and compared between methods and groups.Results We found that GS and INS exhibit opposite patterns of sleep misperception. GS displayed a tendency to overestimate TST and WASO but correctly perceived SOL. The degree of misperception was similar across methods within the GS group. In contrast, INS underestimated their TST and overestimated their SOL both in-lab and at-home, yet the severity of misperception (i.e., degree of mismatch) of SOL was larger at-home than in-lab. Finally, INS overestimated WASO only in-lab while correctly perceiving it at-home. While only the degree of TST misperception was stable across methods in INS, misperception of SOL and WASO were dependent on the method used.Conclusions We found that GS and INS exhibit opposite patterns and severity of sleep misperception. While the degree of misperception in GS was similar across methods, we found that only sleep duration misperception was reliably detected by both in-lab and at-home methods in INS. Our results highlight that, when assessing sleep misperception in individuals with insomnia disorder, the method of data collection should be carefully considered in relation to the main sleep outcomes of interest.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13983243 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04024787 Funding StatementThis research was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 142191, PJT153115) to TDV and JPG. AAP has been funded by local awards (CRIUGM, PERFORM center, Concordia University) and the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. AM was funded by awards from the CRIUGM and University of Montreal. EMP, NW and KG have been funded by awards from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and local university awards (Concordia university, University of Montreal).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Concordia University Human Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsSSMsleep state misperception PSG polysomnographyTSTtotal sleep timeWASOwake after sleep onset SOL sleep onset latencyICSDinternation classification of sleep disorders DSM diagnostic and statistical manualINSinsomnia disorder GS good sleepersAHIapnea-hypopnea index SPI sleep perception indexCBTicognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia