PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Sierra-Heredia, Cecilia AU - Tayyar, Elmira AU - Bozorgi, Yasmin AU - Thakore, Padmini AU - Hagos, Selamawit AU - Carrillo, Ruth AU - Machado, Stefanie AU - Peterson, Sandra AU - Goldenberg, Shira AU - Wiedmeyer, Mei-ling AU - Lavergne, Ruth TI - Growing inequities by immigration group among older adults: Population-based analysis of access to primary care and return to in-person visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada AID - 10.1101/2023.06.23.23291828 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.06.23.23291828 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/26/2023.06.23.23291828.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/26/2023.06.23.23291828.full AB - Background The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic drove a rapid and widespread shift to virtual care, followed by a gradual return to in-person visits. Virtual visits may offer more convenient access to care for some, but others may experience challenges accessing care virtually, and some medical needs must be met in-person. Experiences of the shift to virtual care and benefits of in-person care may vary by immigration experience (immigration status and duration), official language level, and age. We examined use of virtual care and return to in-person visits in the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC), comparing patterns by age and across immigration groups, including length of time in Canada and language level (English) at time of arrival.Methods We used linked administrative health and immigration data to examine total primary care visits (virtual or in-person) and return to in-person visits during the COVID-19 pandemic (2019/20-2021/2) in BC. We examined the proportion of people with any primary care visits and with any in-person visit within each year as measures of access to primary care. We estimated the odds of any primary care visit and any in-person visit by immigration group and official language level assessed prior to arrival: non-immigrants, long-term immigrants, recent immigrants (<5 years) with high assessed English level and recent immigrants (<5 years) with low assessed English level, stratified by age.Results In general, changes in access to primary care (odds of any visit and odds of any in-person visit) were similar across immigration groups over the study period. However, we observed substantial disparities in access to primary care by immigration group among people aged 60+, particularly in recent immigrants with low official language level (0.42, 0.40-0.45). These disparities grew wider over the course of the pandemic.Conclusion Though among younger adults changes in access to primary care between 2019-2021 were similar across immigration groups, we observed significant and growing inequities among older adults, with particularly limited access among adults who immigrated recently and with low assessed English level. Targeted interventions to ensure acceptable, accessible care for older immigrants are needed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research COVID-19 Research Response Fund grant: Preventing and Mitigating the Impacts of COVID-19 Among Im/migrants in British Columbia: Rapid Mixed-Methods Data to Inform Policy and Programmes. Dr. Wiedmeyer receives salary support through a Trainee Award from Michael Smith Health Research BC.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRIS holds ethical approval from the Simon Fraser University (SFU) and Providence healthcare/University of British Columbia (UBC) harmonized ethics review boards. Access to data provided by the Data Steward(s) is subject to approval, but can be requested for research projects through the Data Steward(s) or their designated service providers. All inferences, opinions, and conclusions drawn in this publication are those of the author(s), and do not reflect the opinions or policies of the Data Steward(s).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are approved for use by data stewards and accessed through a process managed by Population Data BC. The data sets used for this study will be archived, and requests for access to them in the context of verification of study findings can be made to PopData (https://www.popdata.bc.ca/data_access). We are not permitted to share the research extract used in this analysis with other researchers.