RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 New tuberculosis vaccines in India: Modelling the potential health and economic impacts of adolescent/adult vaccination with M72/AS01E and BCG-revaccination JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2023.02.24.23286406 DO 10.1101/2023.02.24.23286406 A1 Clark, Rebecca A A1 Weerasuriya, Chathika K A1 Portnoy, Allison A1 Mukandavire, Christinah A1 Quaife, Matthew A1 Bakker, Roel A1 Scarponi, Danny A1 Harris, Rebecca C A1 Rade, Kirankumar A1 Mattoo, Sanjay Kumar A1 Tumu, Dheeraj A1 Menzies, Nicolas A A1 White, Richard G YR 2023 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/10/2023.02.24.23286406.abstract AB Background India had an estimated 2.9 million tuberculosis cases and 506 thousand deaths in 2021. Novel vaccines effective in adolescents and adults could reduce this burden. M72/AS01E and BCG-revaccination have recently completed Phase IIb trials and estimates of their population-level impact are needed. We estimated the potential health and economic impact of M72/AS01E and BCG-revaccination in India and investigated the impact of variation in vaccine characteristics and delivery strategies.Methods We developed an age-stratified compartmental tuberculosis transmission model for India calibrated to country-specific epidemiology. We projected baseline epidemiology to 2050 assuming no-new-vaccine introduction, and M72/AS01E and BCG-revaccination scenarios over 2025–2050 exploring uncertainty in product characteristics (vaccine efficacy, mechanism of effect, infection status required for vaccine efficacy, duration of protection) and implementation (achieved vaccine coverage and ages targeted). We estimated reductions in tuberculosis cases and deaths by each scenario compared to no-new-vaccine introduction, as well as costs and cost-effectiveness from health-system and societal perspectives.Results M72/AS01E scenarios were predicted to avert 40% more tuberculosis cases and deaths by 2050 compared to BCG-revaccination scenarios. Cost-effectiveness ratios for M72/AS01E vaccines were around seven times higher than BCG-revaccination, but nearly all scenarios were cost-effective. The estimated average incremental cost was US$190 million for M72/AS01E and US$23 million for BCG-revaccination per year. Sources of uncertainty included whether M72/AS01E was efficacious in uninfected individuals at vaccination, and if BCG-revaccination could prevent disease.Conclusions M72/AS01E and BCG-revaccination could be impactful and cost-effective in India. However, there is great uncertainty in impact, especially given unknowns surrounding mechanism of effect and infection status required for vaccine efficacy. Greater investment in vaccine development and delivery is needed to resolve these unknowns in vaccine product characteristics.Competing Interest StatementRCH reports employment by Sanofi Pasteur, unrelated to tuberculosis and outside the submitted work. NAM received consulting fees from The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and the WHO, and reports funding to their institution from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, and U.S. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. RGW is also funded for other work by the Wellcome Trust (218261/Z/19/Z), NIH (1R01AI147321-01), EDCTP (RIA208D-2505B), UK MRC (CCF 17-7779 via SET Bloomsbury), ESRC (ES/P008011/1), BMGF (OPP1084276, OPP1135288 & INV-001754), and the WHO. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.Funding StatementWe thank the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for providing funding (INV-001754) to undertake this research.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesEpidemiologic data used are available from the World Health Organization Global TB Report CSV files to download (https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/data) and summarised in the Supplementary Material. Population estimates and projections are available from the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs World Population Prospects 2019 (https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/). Analytic code will be made available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6421372 immediately following publication indefinitely for anyone who wishes to access the data for any purpose.BCGBacillus Calmette–GuérinDALYDisability-adjusted life yearsICERIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioMtbMycobacterium tuberculosisNTEPNational Tuberculosis Elimination ProgrammeWHOWorld Health Organization