RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk associated dynamic functional networks and anatomical asymmetry
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.07.05.23292258
DO 10.1101/2023.07.05.23292258
A1 Rubido, Nicolas
A1 Riedel, Gernot
A1 Vuksanović, Vesna
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/07/2023.07.05.23292258.abstract
AB Genetic associations with macroscopic brain networks can provide insights into healthy and aberrant cortical connectivity in disease. However, associations specific to dynamic functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease are still largely unexplored. Understanding the association between gene expression in the brain and functional connectivity may provide useful information about the molecular processes underlying variations in impaired brain function. Given the potential of dynamic functional connectivity to uncover brain states associated with Alzheimer’s disease, it is interesting to ask: How does gene expression associated with Alzheimer’s disease map onto the dynamic functional brain connectivity? If genetic variants associated with neurodegenerative processes involved in Alzheimer’s disease are to be correlated with brain function, it is essential to generate such a map. Here, we investigate how the relation between gene expression in the brain and dynamic functional connectivity arises from nodal interactions, quantified by their role in network centrality (i.e., the drivers of the metastability), and the principal component of genetic co-expression across the brain. Our analyses include genetic variations associated with Alzheimer’s disease and also genetic variants expressed within the cholinergic brain pathways. Our findings show that contrasts in metastability of functional networks between Alzheimer’s and healthy individuals can in part be explained by the two combinations of genetic co-variations in the brain with the confidence interval between 72% and 92%. The highly central nodes, driving the brain aberrant metastable dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease highly correlate with the magnitude of variations of the two combinations of genes expressed in brain. These nodes include mainly the white matter, parietal and occipital brain regions, each of which (or their combinations) are involved in impaired cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, our results provide evidence of the role of genetic associations across brain regions in asymmetric changes in ageing. We validated our findings on the same cohort using alternative brain parcellation methods. This work demonstrates how genetic variations underpin anomaly in dynamic functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is supported by funds from Roland Sutton Academic Trust (RG:\#RG13688 and \#DSR1058-100).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Source data were openly available before the initiation of the study. http://adni.loni.usc.edu/data-samples/data-types/mri https://www.proteinatlas.org/ I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors