RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Resting-state background features demonstrate multidien cycles in long-term EEG device recordings
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.07.05.23291521
DO 10.1101/2023.07.05.23291521
A1 Ojemann, William K.S.
A1 Scheid, Brittany H.
A1 Mouchtaris, Sofia
A1 Lucas, Alfredo
A1 LaRocque, Joshua J.
A1 Aguila, Carlos
A1 Ashourvan, Arian
A1 Caciagli, Lorenzo
A1 Davis, Kathryn A.
A1 Conrad, Erin C.
A1 Litt, Brian
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/07/2023.07.05.23291521.abstract
AB Background Longitudinal EEG recorded by implanted devices is critical for understanding and managing epilepsy. Recent research reports patient-specific, multi-day cycles in device-detected epileptiform events that coincide with increased likelihood of clinical seizures. Understanding these cycles could elucidate mechanisms generating seizures and advance drug and neurostimulation therapiesObjective/Hypothesis We hypothesize that seizure-correlated cycles are present in background neural activity, independent of interictal epileptiform spikes, and that neurostimulation may disrupt these cycles.Methods We analyzed regularly-recorded seizure-free data epochs from 20 patients implanted with a responsive neurostimulation (RNS) device for at least 1.5 years, to explore the relationship between cycles in device-detected interictal epileptiform activity (dIEA), clinician-validated interictal spikes, background EEG features, and neurostimulation.Results Background EEG features tracked the cycle phase of dIEA in all patients (AUC: 0.63 [0.56 - 0.67]) with a greater effect size compared to clinically annotated spike rate alone (AUC: 0.55 [0.53-0.61], p < 0.01). After accounting for circadian variation and spike rate, we observed significant population trends in elevated theta and beta band power and theta and alpha connectivity features at the cycle peaks (sign test, p < 0.05). In the period directly after stimulation we observe a decreased association between cycle phase and EEG features compared to background recordings (AUC: 0.58 [0.55-0.64]).Conclusions Our findings suggest that seizure-correlated dIEA cycles are not solely due to epileptiform discharges but are associated with background measures of brain state; and that neurostimulation may disrupt these cycles. These results may help elucidate mechanisms underlying seizure generation, provide new biomarkers for seizure risk, and facilitate monitoring, treating, and managing epilepsy with implantable devices.Background EEG features track multidien cycles in RNS dIEAdIEA linked EEG features are patient-specific and may differ with cortical structureResponsive neurostimulation suppresses EEG-dIEA couplingCompeting Interest StatementE.C. is a paid consultant for Epiminder, an EEG device company, but declares no targeted compensation for this work. None of the other authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.Funding StatementThis material is based on work was supported by the Mirowski Family Foundation, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) DP1NS122038, NINDS R61NS125568-01A1, NINDS K23NS121401, Pennsylvania Tobacco Fund, Burroughs Welcome Career Award for Medical Scientists, and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1845298Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All patients considered for this study gave written informed consent in accordance with the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData associated with the RNS device was obtained through a data use agreement between the University of Pennsylvania and NeuroPace, and cannot be publicly shared. However, code used to process RNS device data and perform our analysis can be found on GitHub at https://github.com/penn-cnt/RNS_processing_toolbox and https://github.com/wojemann/multidien-cycle-biomarkers https://github.com/penn-cnt/RNS_processing_toolbox https://github.com/wojemann/multidien-cycle-biomarkers RNSresponsive neurostimulationdIEAdevice-detected interictal epileptiform activityPLVphase-locking value