PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Gao, Xinyi AU - Zhang, Nan AU - Lu, Lei AU - Gao, Tianyu AU - Chou, Oscar Hou In AU - Wong, Wing Tak AU - Chang, Carlin AU - Wai, Abraham Ka Chung AU - Lip, Gregory Y. H. AU - Zhang, Qingpeng AU - Tse, Gary AU - Liu, Tong AU - Zhou, Jiandong TI - New-onset syncope in diabetic patients treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: A Chinese population-based cohort study AID - 10.1101/2023.07.04.23292207 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.07.04.23292207 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/05/2023.07.04.23292207.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/05/2023.07.04.23292207.full AB - Background and Aims Syncope and post-syncopal adverse events lead to a heavy burden in the healthcare systems with negative impact on the economy globally. However, no effective treatments have been identified to prevent the risk of new-onset syncope. This study compared the preventive effect of incident syncope between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i).Methods This was a retrospective, territory-wide cohort study enrolling type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients treated with SGLT2i or DPP4i between January 1st, 2016, and December 31st, 2020, in Hong Kong, China. The outcomes were new-onset syncope, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox regression and different approaches using the propensity score were used to evaluate the association between SGLT2i vs. DPP4i with incident syncope and mortality.Results After matching, a total of 37502 patients with T2DM were included (18751 SGLT2i users, 18751 DPP4i users). During a median follow-up of 5.56 years, compared to DPP4i users, SGLT2i therapy was associated with a 51% lower risk of new-onset syncope (HR, 0.49; 95%CI [0.41-0.57], P<0.001), 65% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.35; 95%CI [0.26-0.46], P<0.001), and a 70% lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.30; 95%CI [0.26-0.34], P<0.001) in the fully adjusted model. Similar association with syncope was observed for dapagliflozin (HR, 0.70; 95%CI [0.58-0.85], P<0.001), canagliflozin (HR, 0.48; 95%CI [0.36-0.63], P<0.001) and ertuglifolzin (HR, 0.45; 95%CI [0.30-0.68], P<0.001), but was attenuated for empagliflozin (HR, 0.79; 95%CI [0.59-1.05], P=0.100) after adjusting for potential confounders. Subgroup analyses suggested that, compared to DPP4i, SGLT2i showed a significantly protective effect in incident syncope among T2DM patients, regardless of gender, age, comorbidities burden and other medication history, as well as among patients with different levels of fasting glucose, HbA1c, and glycemic variability.Conclusions Compared to DPP4i, SGLT2i could significantly reduce the risk of new-onset syncope in patients with T2DM, regardless of gender, age, comorbidities, other medication history, and degree of glycemic control. Our findings suggest a promising future of SGLT2i in preventing incident syncope.Structured graphical abstractCI: confidence interval; DPP4i: dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; HR: hazard ratio; SGLT2i: sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no funding for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (HKU/HA HKWC IRB) (UW-20-250) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.