RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A Real-Time Deep Learning Approach for Inferring Intracranial Pressure from Routinely Measured Extracranial Waveforms in the Intensive Care Unit
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.05.16.23289747
DO 10.1101/2023.05.16.23289747
A1 Nair, Shiker S.
A1 Guo, Alina
A1 Boen, Joseph
A1 Aggarwal, Ataes
A1 Chahal, Ojas
A1 Tandon, Arushi
A1 Patel, Meer
A1 Sankararaman, Sreenidhi
A1 Azad, Tej
A1 Pirracchio, Romain
A1 Stevens, Robert D.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/02/2023.05.16.23289747.abstract
AB Objective Intracranial pressure (ICP) is a physiological variable used to assess the neurological state of patients with life-threatening intracranial pathology, such as traumatic brain injury or stroke. The current standard of care for measuring ICP requires a catheter to be inserted into the brain, which is associated with an appreciable risk of hemorrhage and infection. We hypothesize that ICP can be computed from extracranial waveforms routinely measured in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), such as invasive arterial blood pressure (ABP), photoplethysmography (PPG), and electrocardiography (ECG).Methods We extracted 600 hours of simultaneous ABP, ECG, PPG, and ICP data (sampled at 125 Hz) across 10 different patients from the MIMIC III Waveform Database. These recordings were segmented into 10 second windows and used to train six different deep learning models with ABP, ECG, and PPG waveforms as input features. Models were evaluated in both a singlepatient analysis and multi-patient analysis.Results The performances of the six deep learning models were compared, revealing two tiers of performance. Among the top-tier models, the mean average error (MAE) for inferring ICP was approximately 1.50 mmHg for singlepatient analysis and 5 mmHg for multi-patient analysis.Conclusions These preliminary and novel results indicate the feasibility and accuracy of noninvasive ICP estimation by training deep learning models with extracranial physiological data. With further validation, this approach could be implemented in a continuous real-time fashion, thereby reducing risks associated with invasive monitoring and allowing more timely treatment of patients with critical brain injuries.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study using publicly available and de-identified data from MIMIC III which can be located at: https://physionet.org/content/mimiciii/1.4/I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll input data in this study is available online at: https://physionet.org/content/mimic3wdb/1.0/ https://physionet.org/content/mimic3wdb/1.0/ https://physionet.org/content/mimiciii/1.4/