PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Harrop, Emily
AU  - Mirra, Renata Medeiros
AU  - Goss, Silvia
AU  - Longo, Mirella
AU  - Byrne, Anthony
AU  - Farnell, Damian JJ
AU  - Seddon, Kathy
AU  - Penny, Alison
AU  - Machin, Linda
AU  - Sivell, Stephanie
AU  - Selman, Lucy E
TI  - Prolonged grief during and beyond the pandemic: Factors associated with levels of grief in a four time-point longitudinal survey of people bereaved in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic
AID  - 10.1101/2023.06.22.23291742
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.06.22.23291742
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/29/2023.06.22.23291742.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/29/2023.06.22.23291742.full
AB  - Background The COVID-19 pandemic has been a devastating and enduring mass-bereavement event, with uniquely difficult sets of circumstances experienced by people bereaved at this time. However, little is known about the long-term consequences of these experiences, including the prevalence of Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) and other conditions in pandemic-bereaved populations.Methods A longitudinal survey of people bereaved in the UK between 16 March 2020 and 2 January 2021, with data collected at baseline (n=711), c. 8 (n=383), 13 (n=295) and 25 (n=185) months post- bereavement. Using measures of Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) (Traumatic Grief Inventory), grief vulnerability (Adult Attitude to Grief Scale), and social support (Inventory of Social Support), this analysis examines how participant characteristics, characteristics of the deceased and pandemic- related circumstances (e.g. restricted visiting, social isolation, social support) are associated with grief outcomes, with a focus on levels of PGD.Results At baseline, 628 (88.6%) of participants were female, with a mean age of 49.5 (SD 12.9). 311 (43.8%) deaths were from confirmed/suspected COVID-19. Sample demographics were relatively stable across time points 34.6% of participants met the cut-off for indicated PGD at c. 13 months bereaved and 28.6% at final follow-up. Social isolation and loneliness in early bereavement and lack of social support over time strongly contributed to higher levels of PGD, whilst feeling well supported by healthcare professionals following the death was associated with reduced levels of PGD. Characteristics of the deceased most strongly associated with lower PGD scores, were a more distant relationship (e.g. death of a grandparent), an expected death and death occurring in a care- home. Participant characteristics associated with higher levels of PGD included low level of formal education and existence of medical conditions.Conclusion Results suggest higher than expected levels of PGD compared with pre-pandemic times, with important implications for bereavement policy, provision and practice now (e.g. strengthening of social and specialist support) and in preparedness for future pandemics and mass-bereavement events (e.g. guidance on infection control measures and rapid support responses).Competing Interest StatementConflicts of interest: All authors except AP declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article. AP declared a potential financial interest relating to lobbying by the Childhood Bereavement Network and National Bereavement Alliance for additional financial support for the bereavement sector.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the UKRI/ESRC (Grant No. ES/V012053/1), with the final fourth survey round funded by a Marie Curie Small Grant (MCSGS-21-701). The project was also supported by the Marie Curie core grant funding to the Marie Curie Research Centre, Cardiff University (grant no. MCCC-FCO-11-C). E.H., A.B. S.S. and M.L. posts are supported by the Marie Curie core grant funding (grant no. MCCC-FCO-11-C).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (SMREC 20/59) of Cardiff University gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesFull study data (T1-T3) is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service via https://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/855751. T4 data (from the study extension) can be requested from lead/corresponding author. https://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/855751